Q. Is 'friend' a position at a court? How is it different?
ns
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, a friend is a position at the king's court only if he is good, and only if we have faith in him that he will give us advice that is good for the king, his kingdom, and other kingdom's too. If the friend is bad and the king doesn't have faith in him, he is no longer having a position at the court because he may give advice which is not good for the king, his kingdom, and the neighboring kingdoms but good for himself. He may be selfish.
For example:- If the king wants to attack his opponent kingdom. He is ready for the war. Only a day is remaining for the hour of battle to sound. The king with his courtiers is sitting in the court and having a talk about the war is going on. The king is thinking that his opponent is very weak but really he is strong enough to destroy his opponent's kingdom. He asks all other courtiers their advice on this. All courtiers tell that the opponent is weak but the king's good friend will advise him that don't think that your opponent is weak, everyone is strong and can be able to destroy you and your kingdom. But a bad friend will always tell opposite of it and he will want his friend, the king to die in the war so that he will be the new king. This is the difference.
Mark me 'The Brainliest'
Answer:
The most common instance in the news is when an advocacy organisation submits a brief in a case before an appeal court in which it is not a litigant. Appellant cases are often confined to the facts and arguments from the lower court case under appeal; attorneys focus on the facts and arguments that are most beneficial to their clients. Where a case may have larger repercussions, amicus curiae briefs are a mechanism to express those concerns so that the potentially extensive legal consequences of court rulings do not rely entirely on the parties immediately engaged in the case.
Explanation:
In high-profile trials across the world, amici curiae are often large-budget legal groups. Such briefs are commonly submitted by non-profit legal advocacy organisations such as the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, or the American Center for Law and Justice to advocate for or against a specific law change or interpretation. Companies other than the plaintiffs may desire to have their concerns heard if a judgement has the potential to influence an entire sector. Federal courts in the United States frequently consider issues regarding the validity of state legislation. Other states may file papers as amici curiae in this case if their laws are likely to be affected.
#SPJ2