Question

Q. Why were Jyoti rao Phule and Ramaswamy Naicker critical of the national
movement? Did their criticism help the national struggle in any way?​

Answer 1

Answer:

$\bold\pink{❥ᴀ᭄ɴsᴡᴇʀ:⤵}$

Explanation:

They were critical of the national movement run by upper-caste leaders because they held that this would serve the purposes of upper-castes. After the movement, these people would again talk of untouchability. Again they would say, "Me here and you over there". Periyar left the Congress in the reaction of an incidence of untouchability. Yes, their criticism helped the national struggle as unity. The forceful speeches, writings, and movements of such lower caste leaders did lead to rethinking and some self-criticisms among upper-caste nationalist leaders.

❥MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST ♥️

Answer 2

Explanation:

They were critical of the national movement run by upper-caste leaders because they held that this would serve the purposes of upper-castes. After the movement, these people would again talk of untouchability. Again they would say, "Me here and you over there". Periyar left the Congress in the reaction of an incidence of untouchability. Yes, their criticism helped the national struggle as unity. The forceful speeches, writings, and movements of such lower caste leaders did lead to rethinking and some self-criticisms among upper-caste nationalist leaders.