History, asked by raushanjahan307, 2 months ago

Q1 Who were the Radicals? Why were they unhappy with the policies of the Moderates?
Q2 How were the methods of agitation of the Radicals different from those of the Moderates? (class 8) ​

Answers

Answered by pushkarmehra46
3

Explanation:

Ans 1 The politics of the radicals within the Congress was different from that of the moderates. The radicals were opposed to the “politics of prayers” followed by the Moderates within congress. They explored more radical objectives and methods.

Radicals:

a. The radicals opposed the moderate’s ‘policy of petitions’ and ‘resolutions’.

b. They laid stress on self-reliance and constructive work.

c. Radicals demanded ‘Swaraj’ from British rule.

d. The extremists advocated the radical methods of strikes and boycott for the fulfillment of their demands.

Moderates:

a. Wanted self-government or Swaraj within the British Empire.

b. Their whole attitude was of reconciliation and not confrontation.

c. They would do nothing which would offend the British rulers.

d. The demands were presented to the British through petitions, meetings, speeches and resolutions.

Answered by sidra45
3

Explanation:

The moderates demanded the expansion of councils and giving them more power on the opinion that these reforms would train India in self-governance, and eventually they would become capable of governing the country.The radical nationalists on the other hand, rejected the entire idea that the Indians needed benevolent guidance or assistance of foreigners.These leaders wanted swaraj or complete autonomy,as they regarded it their birthright.

HOPE ITS CORRECT .

PLZ MARK AS BRAINLIEST

Similar questions