Social Sciences, asked by princessattitude910, 7 months ago

Q5. Begum RokeyaSakhawat Hossain was a prolific writer who challenged orthodox notions.

Justify the statement.

Q5. What is the benefit of having an elected government?


pls pls.answer it​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
1

Rokeya Sakhawat Hossain (রোকেয়া সাখাওয়াত হোসেন) (1880 – December 9, 1932), was a prolific writer and a social worker in undivided Bengal in the early 20th century. She is most famous for her efforts on behalf of gender equality and other social issues. She established the first school aimed primarily at Muslim girls, which still exists today. She was a notable Muslim feminist; modern feminist writers such as Taslima Nasrin cite her as an influence. Begum Rokeya also wrote short stories and novels. Her important books are Sultana's Dream and Paddorag.

.What are the advantages and disadvantages of an election?

Samsung Galaxy F41 I Sale starts 16th Oct.

Lots of good answers here. I'll add a few thoughts.

PROS:

When you disperse political power it allows people to protect themselves using that power for potential authoritarians (the other side of that coin is the tyranny of the majority, discussed below). Also, some argue that only you really know your best interests, and thus you should have a say in the process (even if it's through a representative).

Elections also confer legitimacy on a state when done fairly (but also can serve to legitimize an autocratic state if not fair).

Elections keep leaders compliant with at least the needs of the majority of the population, otherwise they will be voted out.

CONS.

Voters don't have sophisticated knowledge and don't always make ideal policy decisions. Many voters are both uninformed about political issues and often use motivated reasoning because it's a shortcut and most people don't have time to become political experts. This isn't too much of a problem when you have legislators with autonomy, but can become problematic when populist movements try to take the reins. Legislators, on the other hand, are usually much more technocratic and rely on experts and science to inform their policies. This isn't always the case but on average legislators are better policymakers (and when they're bad at it it's usually because they are afraid of their voters, not because they're actually bad at it).

Elections can legitimize deviant behavior. You might end up with a tyranny of the majority, which you can still see traces of in the US with things like laws that make it more difficult to vote or those that disenfranchise past felons. These specifically make it harder for Black Americans to vote, for example, and distorts a lot of voting in the US south.

Elections can also be used to legitimize autocratic dictators, who hold sham elections where no other party really has a chance to win, such as in Russia and China

Answered by reyanshhdvd
0

Answer:

Bhanchod gandu your face is like tati jo. in kar

Similar questions