Question

QNo.8 The Supreme Court has ruled that a person
belonging to a non-reserved class transplanted by
adoption or marriage or conversion or any other voluntary
act to a family belonging to reserved class does not
become eligible to the benefit of reservation either under
Article 15(4) or 16(4) of the constitution in:
A. Indra Sawheny v. Union of India
B. Kumari Madhuri Patel v. Additional Commissioner Tribal
Development
C. Valsamma Paul v. Cochin University
D. M.D. Kasekar v. Vishwanth Pandu Barde
​

Answer 1

Answer:

The Supreme Court has ruled that a person

belonging to a non-reserved class transplanted by

adoption or marriage or conversion or any other voluntary

act to a family belonging to reserved class does not

become eligible to the benefit of reservation either under

Article 15(4) or 16(4) of the constitution in:

A. Indra Sawheny v. Union of India

B. Kumari Madhuri Patel v. Additional Commissioner Tribal

Development

C. Valsamma Paul v. Cochin University

D. M.D. Kasekar v. Vishwanth Pandu Barde