Que 7:-Legislature, executive and judiciary come under which type of power
Answers
Answer:
Legislative—Makes laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate) Executive—Carries out laws (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies) Judicial—Evaluates laws (Supreme Court and other courts)
Answer:
In ancient India, the king discharged inter-alia the judicial functions. The King was required to decide cases in open trial and in the courtroom and his dress and demeanor were to be such as not to overawe the litigant. He was required to take the oath of impartiality and decide cases without bias or attachment. Kartiyayan says, “the King should enter the Courtroom modestly dressed, take his seat facing east and with an attentive mind, hear the suits of his litigants”. He should act under the guidance of his judges". Kartiyayan goes on to say, “the judges guiding the King during the trial of a case were required to be independent and fearless and prevent him from committing any error or injustice. If the King wants to inflict upon the litigants an illegal or unrighteous decision, it is the duty of the judge to warn the King and prevent him”. As time passed, the King had numerous other duties and could not afford enough time to conduct litigations. He delegated his judicial functions to professional judges. Kartiyayan and all other lawgivers emphasized that the judges were to be independent and fearless even of the King. The King was not to interfere with the judiciary and on the contrary, the latter was under a duty to interfere in a case of a wrong decision by the King. John W. Spellman in “Political Theory of Ancient India” (Page 128) stated that in some respects judicial system of ancient India was theoretically better than our own today.
After the disintegration of the Harsha Empire, the administration became generally confused and obscure. The country became divided into small Kingdoms resulting in invasions of the Muslims.