Que-ll Kamal, Khan and Devid are partners in a firm engaged
in the distribution of datry product in Madhya
Pardesh. Kamal is a holder of senior Secondary
School Certificate from central board of Secondary
Education with Business studles as one of the hit
Pelectiv subjects. Khan had done his post graducation
in Hindi literature and Devid in Dairy farming. Oneday
there was a serious discussion between Khan and
Revid regarding the nature of Management as a
'Science, khan argued that Management was not a
science whereas bevid was of the optises opinion
that Management was a science. Kamal intewend and
corect both Khan and Devid about the natuu
of Management as a science with the help of his
Aneowledge of Beuhess Studies. Escplain, how Kamal
I would have been able to satisfy both Kanan and
Devid.
And-IL
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Kamal would have satisfied both Khan and David by explaining the nature of management as a Science.
1- Systematic body of knowledge
- management has its own set of theories that have been developed over a period of time. just like science, it has a systematic body of knowledge. it has its own terms and concepts
2- principles based on experimentations
- Just like science, it has its own principles that have been evolved through repeated observations and experimentations. though the results are not predictable since it deals with the human element of the organization.
for exaple, scientific management principles by FW Taylor were evolved through repeated experiments and observations.
(Vanshikagupta)
Answer:
Kamal would have satisfied both Khan and Devid by giving the following points for considering
management as a science:
1. Existence of a systematized body of knowledge. Like science, management has its own theory,
techniques and principles. It also draws some principles from various disciplines such as
Economics, Sociology, Psychology and Mathematics. So this feature of science is present in
management.
2. Principles based on observation and experimentation. Management principles have been
developed on the basis of scientific observation and experiments in different types of
organisation.
3. Universal validity and application. The principles of management are not as exact as the
principles of science and their application and their use is not universal. They have to be modified
according to a given situation. However, they provide managers with certain standardized
techniques that can be used in different situations irrespective of the area, region and country.
4. Cause and effect relationship. Principles of management like science establish cause and effect
relationship between different variables. For example, Lack of unity of command would lead to
confusion and indiscipline. So, this feature of science is also present in management.
Hence management has some features of science that is the reason why it is considered as an
inexact science not a pure science. It is a soft science or a social science as management is
concerned with human beings whose behaviour cannot be predicted with absolute accuracy.
If you are satisfied with the answer mark me as brain list