Political Science, asked by BrainlyHelper, 1 year ago

Question 1:
What is meant by freedom? Is there a relationship between freedom for the individual and freedom for the nation?

Answers

Answered by nikitasingh79
33

ANSWER :  

Freedom is very essential for the development of the personality of an individual. Generally freedom means absence of restraints. It means freedom to act without being subjected to any restraint. But in a true sense freedom does not mean so. In fact ,liberty signifies “a power or capacity of doing or enjoying.” It is not a license to do what a person can do but it is a freedom to do anything with caution and responsibility. Aung San Suu Kyi says, “For me real freedom is freedom from fear and unless you can live free from fear you cannot live a dignified human life.” According to T.H.Green , “Freedom is the positive power or capacity of doing or enjoying something worth doing worth enjoying.”

There is a close relationship between freedom for the individual and freedom for the nation. For individual freedom it is essential that the nation should also enjoy freedom. Where nation is not free, citizens cannot enjoy freedom.Aung San Suu Kyi sees  her freedom as connected to the freedom of her people. Mandela spent 28 years of his life in jail for the freedom of the State and for personal freedom. Under the British rule, Indians were not enjoying freedoms and rights. There were many restrictions on the freedoms and rights of the individual. Indian National Congress under the leadership of Gandhiji and other leaders launched various movements for freedom for the nation because these leaders knew very well that Nation's freedom is very essential for the freedom of the individual. In short the individual can have little freedom - civil ,political or economic unless there is National Liberty. India attained freedom on 15 August, 1947.

HOPE THIS ANSWER WILL HELP YOU...


gouribmanoj: yaar how is my answer hurting u???
Answered by Anonymous
16

Freedom is absence of constraints. Freedom is said to exist when external constraints on the individual are absent. In terms of this definition an individual could be considered free if he/she is not subject to external controls or coercion and is able to make independent decisions and act in an autonomous way

There is a close relationship between freedom for the individual and freedom for the nation. Some people say that freedom is said to exist when external constrainsts on the individual are absent. Absence of constraints is only one dimension of freedom. Freedom is also about expanding the ability of people to freely express themselves and develop their potential. If a nation is a free every individual of it will be free. Freedom in this sense is the condition in which people can develop their creativity and capabilities. Greatness, power, development of a nation depends on cooperation, creativity and capabilities of individuals of a nation.

Similar questions