Question 2:
Look at the wordings of the two documents given below. The first
column is from the 1990 Nepal Constitution. The second column is from
the more recent interim Constitution of Nepal.
1990 Constitution of Nepal
2007 Interim Constitution
Part 7: Executive
Part 5: Executive
Article 35: Executive Power: The
executive power of the Kingdom of
Nepal shall be vested in His Majesty
and the Council of Ministers.
Article 37: Executive Power:
the executive power of Nepal
shall be vested in the council of
Ministers.
What is the difference in who exercises Executive Power in the above
two Constitutions of Nepal? Keeping this in mind, why do you think
Nepal needs a new Constitution today?
Answers
Answer:
Answer: A Constitution tells us what the fundamental nature of our society is. A country is usually made up of different communities of people who share certain beliefs but may not necessarily agree on all issues. A Constitution helps serve as a set of rules and principles that all persons in a country can agree upon as the basis of the way in which they want the country to be governed. This includes not only the type of government but also an agreement on certain ideals that they all believe the country should uphold. Hence, a democratic country needs a Constitution.
please mark me brainliest
Answer :-
In Article 35 of the 1990 Constitution of Nepal, the powers to rule the country, to set rules and to manage the country are all vested in the King of the country and the Ministers appointed under him.
However, Article 75 of the 2015 Constitution of Nepal states that the rules, governance and management of the country will be based on the laws mentioned in the Constitution of the country under the supervision of the Ministers.
_______