Math, asked by shyjiamruth, 1 year ago

R={(a,b):b=a+1} on the set A={1,2,3,4,5,6}
R={(x,y): x-2y-3=0} on the set of all real numbers R
show that these set are whether transitive or reflexive or symmetric


ASAP ...PLSSS.​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
7

Answer:

set 1 st is not reflexive as if u put any value in a from set A it will not return the same value hence time is not reflexive

symmetric : this set is also not symmetric as if we put a= 1 we get b= 2 and this pair becomes (1,2)

now put a=2 we get b= 3 hence it's not symmetric

also it's not transitive

do the same processes to find set 2

Answered by shadowsabers03
22

Consider the relation \sf{R:A\to A} on the set \sf{A=\{1,\ 2,\ 3,\ 4,\ 5,\ 6\}} defined as,

\longrightarrow\sf{R=\{(a,\ b):b=a+1\}}

We see that,

\longrightarrow\sf{a\neq a+1}

\Longrightarrow\sf{(a,\ a)\notin R}

Therefore, R is not reflexive.

We see that,

\longrightarrow\sf{b=a+1\quad\implies\quad a=b-1}

\Longrightarrow\sf{a\neq b+1}

\Longrightarrow\sf{(b,\ a)\notin R}

Therefore, R is not symmetric.

Assume \sf{(b,\ c)\in R,} such that,

\longrightarrow\sf{c=b+1}

\longrightarrow\sf{c=a+1+1}

\longrightarrow\sf{c=a+2}

\Longrightarrow\sf{c\neq a+1}

\longrightarrow\sf{(a,\ c)\notin R}

Therefore, R is not transitive.

___________________________________

Consider the relation \sf{R:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}} defined as,

\longrightarrow\sf{R=\{(x,\ y):x-2y-3=0\}}

We see that if we take \sf{x=y} in such a way that \sf{(x,\ x)\in R} as an assumption,

\longrightarrow\sf{x-2x-3=0}

\longrightarrow\sf{-x-3=0}

\longrightarrow\sf{x=-3}

This gives a unique solution and hence this condition is not applicable to all real numbers.

\Longrightarrow\sf{(x,\ x)\notin R}

Therefore, R is not reflexive.

By definition of our relation, we have,

\longrightarrow\sf{y=\dfrac{x-3}{2}\quad\quad\dots(1)}

Assume there exists a relation,

\longrightarrow\sf{y-2x-3=0.}

in such a way that \sf{(y,\ x)\in R} as an assumption.

From (1),

\longrightarrow\sf{\dfrac{x-3}{2}-2x-3=0.}

\longrightarrow\sf{x=-3}

This also gives a unique solution and not applicable to all real numbers.

\Longrightarrow\sf{(y,\ x)\notin R}

Therefore, R is not symmetric.

Assume there exists a relation of \sf{y} and \sf{z} as,

\longrightarrow\sf{y-2z-3=0}

such that \sf{(y,\ z)\in R} as an assumption.

From (1),

\longrightarrow\sf{\dfrac{x-3}{2}-2z-3=0}

\longrightarrow\sf{x-4z-9=0}

\Longrightarrow\sf{x-2z-3\neq0}

\Longrightarrow\sf{(x,\ z)\notin R}

Therefore, R is not transitive.

Similar questions