Rakesh was caught jumping the traffic signal and as a punishment, he was sought to be imprisoned. However, instead of being imprisoned, Rakesh could pay a fine. Which category of crime does the above act belong to?
a. Compoundable offences
b. Non – compoundable offences
c. Cognizable offences
d. Non – bailable offence
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
non cognizable offences are bailable but cognizable offense I don't think so. a and b and d definitely not.
and the scenario of rakesh crime is non-cognizable . I hope the option c is non-cognizable.
Answered by
4
Rakesh was caught jumping the traffic signal and instead of being imprisoned, Rakesh could pay a fine. This crime belongs to the category of Compoundable offenses.
Explanation:
- Compoundable offenses are those 'that can be 'compromised', i.e. the 'complainant can agree to 'take back the charges' levied against the accused'. He/she can pay a fine, instead of facing charges.
- Whereas, non - compoundable offenses are the more serious offenses in which the parties cannot compromise.
Similar questions