Read Ahmad's argument in favor of changing the minimum driving age from 16 to 15. Every year, millions of teenagers look forward to the freedom of earning their driver's license. It has been proven over time that teenagers are fully responsible by the time they are 15, and making teens wait until they are 16 to obtain a driver's license is wrong. Many teenagers play sports, work jobs, and have an active social life when they are 15. It would be beneficial to the functioning of society if these people were able to independently drive themselves around. Parents agree, too. Most people believe that the streets would be safer if the minimum driving age were reduced to 15. What is the best evaluation of Ahmad's reasoning? It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning. It is logical because it stays on topic. It is illogical because it shows no bias. It is logical because it gives true statistics.
Answers
Answer:
Its A - It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning.
Explanation:
On Edge 2021
Answer:
The answer to the abovementioned question is option A which states, " It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning".
Explanation:
The abovementioned paragraph talks about an argument by Ahmad. He talks in favor of changing the minimum driving age to 15 from 16. His argument is based on the fact that children need their driving licenses to have an active social life. A 15year old is supposed to be concentrating on his studies and career, not on how to maintain their social life. The kids who have jobs are part-time jobs and they have their bicycles and public transport to help them travel from one place to another. No parent who want the good for their child would want their kid to be friends with the wrong kind and get into trouble. Innocence of a child is something we should try to protect rather than just asking them to be independent drivers as a child. One year can bring a great difference. We should be training our children to be independent and prepare themselves for the world but not on the expense of their good school days.
Hence, it is safe to conclude that Ahmad's argument is illogical because not only it does not have the vision but also relies on faulty reasoning.