Read Colin's argument. Nowadays, one often hears complaints that drones can invade people's privacy. But this is not true. Flying drones is actually a sport. It requires coordination and technical skills like other sports. In fact, there should be professional drone-flying leagues. If people recognized this sport, they would no longer complain about where and when drone owners flew their drones. Is Colin's evidence relevant to his claim? Yes, because he gives evidence that flying drones is a sport. Yes, because it is on the subject of people owning and flying drones. No, because he only gives his own opinion rather than providing evidence. No, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.
Answers
Answer:
In my opinion the correct option would be No, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues, i.e. the last option.
Explanation:
This is so because we can easily eliminate the rest of the answers which only leaves this answer remaining correct.
For instance,
Yes, because he gives evidence that flying drones is a sport. = WRONG
Why?
Because the claim is not about flying drones being a sport but, is about drones being used as a means of invasion of privacy.
Yes, because it is on the subject of people owning and flying drones.
Again, WRONG.
Why?
Because the claim is not about people owning and flying drones, but is about drones being used as a means of invasion of privacy.
No, because he only gives his own opinion rather than providing evidence
WRONG. He does give evidence.
this leaves only the last answer being correct. His argument does not match correctly.
Answer:
D- No, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.