Social Sciences, asked by sharmabinod35067, 4 months ago

Read the following extract and answer the question given below:

The policy of annexation of Dalhousie, particularly, the Doctrine of Lapse, created

fear and resentment among Indian rulers. They were not allowed to adopt heir to

the throne. This policy ensured that those kingdoms, where the kings did not have

natural heirs, would be taken over by the British after the demise of the King.

Which of the following statement/ statements is/are not true about the Doctrine of

Lapse

i. An annexation policy of Dalhousie.

ii. It created resentment among Indian rulers.

iii. The Indian rulers had to pay a subsidy for the maintenance of the British army.

A. Only option i is incorrect

B. Option ii & iii are incorrect

C. Option iii is incorrect

D. All are incorrect​

Answers

Answered by samleanderv
0

Answer:

The doctrine of lapse was an annexation policy applied by the British East India Company in India until 1859. According to the doctrine, any Indian princely state under the suzerainty of the British East India Company (the dominant imperial power in the Indian subsidiary system), would have its princely status abolished (and therefore be annexed into British India) if the ruler was either "manifestly incompetent or died without a male heir".[1] The latter supplanted the long-established right of an Indian sovereign without an heir to choose a successor.[citation needed] In addition, the British decided whether potential rulers were competent enough. The doctrine and its applications were widely regarded by many Indians as illegitimate.

The policy is most commonly associated with Lord Dalhousie, who was the Governor General of the East India Company in India between 1848 and 1856. However, it was articulated by the Court of Directors of the East India Company as early as 1847 and several smaller states had already been annexed under this doctrine before Dalhousie took over the post of Governor-General.[citation needed] Dalhousie used the policy most vigorously and extensively, though, so it is generally associated with him.

Explanation:

Similar questions