Read the following introduction to a website titled Tarantu-love! What is the most logical conclusion you can make about the credibility of this source?
Welcome to Tarantu-love! Your source of spider-info since 2013! This week's Tarantula Tidbit: Although many people believe tarantulas to be dangerous, research in Wildlife Weekly magazine proved that their venom was weaker than that of the typical bee! Want to learn more? Select a link from the menu to take a virtual tour of the Jackson Zoo's Tarantula Terrarium, to view a list of recommended books from biologists, or to submit a question to an expert from the Albertville Arachnid Association. (5 points)
a
The site has an agenda and wants to sell tickets to the zoo.
b
This should be a good source of objective information since it provides unbiased information.
c
The title of the site is Tarantu-love. This silly title proves that it is not a serious website.
d
The year in which the website was started suggests that the information is likely outdated.
Answers
Answered by
6
Answer:
b
Explanation:
a) out of context/presumption
c) out of context/presumption
d) the year is when the organisation was setup, doesn't refer to the year of information
Answered by
0
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
I did the test!
Similar questions