English, asked by nikitakumai9410, 5 months ago

Read the following pagonge carefully
1. Every form of human activity upsets or changes the wildlife compler of the area unceasing and
ingvoidably. Man has destroyed many forms of wildlife for no reasonable purpose, Small six
of the community, for their own piatton, selfish ends, have destuned many things of yera
Interest
, Expediency bas often led man to make ysve blunders in Vand use, habitat deundin,
and the extermination of many forms of wildlife,
2. In his everyday life, man's attitude is determined in the main by purely practical considerations,
ethical or moral considerations come afterwards, inked at in this way, the disappearance from
Britain of such animals as the wolf and wild boar can be more easily understood. In our intensively
cultivated and over-populated country there was no won for sich large mammals, the one a
predator of big livestock and the other a post to agriculture. This, man's first attitude to animals
is the result of their effect on his own survival, or what he considers to be their effect on his
survival.
3. Then there is his concern with sport. The animals he sets aside for this purpose ancien special
protection and war is waged unceasingly on any other creatures that may be a danger to then
This creates many problems and man has made snious errors in his destruction of predators. Until
rccent years all hawks and falcons were destroyed as "vermin" by game preservers. This meant
the destruction of kostrels, which are useful to the farmer. It meant the destruction of ons, which
ure uscſul to the farmer; so here you had sport acting against the interests of led production.
The tragedy of all this is that all the killing of predators did not in any way improve man's spon.
It has been clearly shown boy modern reucarch that cagles, hawks, falemns and predatory mammals
have not the slightest effect on the oumbers of game birds anywhere,
4. Broadly speaking, man wages war against the creatures which he considers harmful, even when
bis warfare makes little or no difference to the numbers of his enemics, And he encourages
those creatures which are useful, even though their attacks on seests make little difference to the
numbers of those pestu. It would be true to say, therefore, that our attitude to ne birds, to most
birds of prey and to many of our predatory animals, arizes from the fad that they have either
been proved useful or of no consequence. Either way, from this, we have developed the idea of
conservation which means preserving what we have left of our heritage of wildlife and even finding
room for raritics which may do a little damage on the side.​

Answers

Answered by addusajjan
1

Answer:

its in your text book plzz see.i think so ok bye

Answered by tastaj2014
1

Answer:

ghmdfjhygkkjgfghjjfghfvbhgcbjjhhgghjhhhh

Similar questions