Question

Read the passage.

(1) While banning books is not a trendy topic these days, it is still important to acknowledge the outdated and threatening nature of this ongoing practice. (2) The banning of books should be made illegal, based on the rights protected by the First Amendment. (3) If the practice of banning books continues, soon authorities will be banning every other form of media as well. (4) If the Supreme Court has found the banning of books in violation of the Constitution, then who am I to argue?



Which sentence in this passage contains a logical fallacy that should be removed?


sentence 1

sentence 2

sentence 3

sentence 4

Answer 1

I think its sentence 4

mark me plsss brainliest

Answer 2

Answer:

sentence 3  in this passage contains a logical fallacy that should be removed.

Explanation:

• When private individuals, public officials, or groups prevent books from being read in libraries, on school reading lists, or on store shelves because they disagree with their themes, ideas, or substance, this is known as book banning.
• Those who support a ban generally claim that the book in question contains graphic violence, insults parents and family, exalts evil, is unworthy of literary merit, is inappropriate for a certain age range, or uses offensive language.
• The removal, suppression, or restricted distribution of literary, artistic, or educational content—images, ideas, and information—in books occurs on the justification that such content is morally or otherwise undesirable by the censor's standards.
• "The regulation of speech and other kinds of expression by an established authority" is what censorship is.
• The main goal of all forms of censorship is to serve as "a kind of safety for society, usually to uphold standards and ideals.
• " What is deemed offensive from a political, moral, or religious perspective is suppressed through censorship.

Hence, If this trend of banning books continues, soon all other forms of media will be prohibited by the government contains a logical fallacy that should be removed.

#SPJ2