Social Sciences, asked by Ikonikscenario7122, 2 months ago

Read the section "Widespread Backlash Over Court Ruling."

HOW does this section contribute to the article's MAIN idea?

Group of answer choices

It gives the reader the first opportunity to realize that some people supported segregation.

It explains how Thurgood Marshall used his influence to eventually become a Supreme Court justice.

It shows how some people reacted negatively to the Brown v. Board of Education ruling.

It persuades readers to take action against segregation and write to their local government officials.

Answers

Answered by rahul751046
1

Answer:

hear is your answer hope it will help you

Explanation:

Thurgood Marshall’s litigation of Brown v. Board

of Education in 1952—the landmark case, decided in

1954, that made segregation illegal in United States

public schools—was not his first case before the U.S.

(5) Supreme Court. Some legal scholars claim that the

cases he presented to the court in the sixteen years

before his successful argument for desegregation of

public schools were necessary forerunners of that case:

preliminary tests of legal strategies and early erosions

(10) of the foundations of discrimination against African

Americans that paved the way for success in Brown.

When Marshall joined the legal staff of the

National Association for the Advancement of Colored

People (NAACP) in 1936, the organization was

(15) divided on how to proceed against the legal doctrine

that for forty years had promoted “separate but equal”

facilities for African Americans in educational

institutions, in public transportation, and various other

civic amenities. One approach was to emphasize that

(20) facilities were not in fact equal and to pursue litigation

whose practical goal was the improvement both of

opportunity for African Americans and of the facilities

themselves. A second, more theoretical, approach was

to argue that the concept of separate but equal facilities

(25) for the races was by its very nature impossible to

fulfill, rendering the doctrine self-contradictory and

hence legally unsound. Marshall correctly believed that

the latter approach would eventually be the one to

bring repeal of the doctrine, but felt it necessary in the

(30) short term to argue several cases using the former

approach, in order to demonstrate the numerous ways

in which segregation prevented real equality and thus

to prepare the courts to recognize the validity of the

theoretical argument.

Answered by MJ0022
0

Answer:

It shows how some people reacted negatively to the Brown v. Board of Education ruling.

Explanation:

The section "Widespread Backlash Over Court Ruling" contributes to the article's main idea by providing insight into the reactions of specific individuals and groups to the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, which declared segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional.

This section helps the reader understand that not everyone supported the ruling and that there was significant opposition to it. This information helps to paint a complete picture of the societal attitudes towards segregation during this period.

It provides context for the more significant issue of racial inequality that the article is likely discussing. Additionally, this section may also illustrate the resistance and challenges faced in efforts to end segregation, highlighting the importance of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling in the broader fight for civil rights.

To learn more about negatively, click on the given link.

https://brainly.in/question/44367501

To learn more about  Brown v. Board, click on the given link.

https://brainly.in/question/15791400

#SPJ2

Similar questions