Question

Read the sources given below and answer the questions that follows:
Source A: Protection of property A magistrate reported in 1970 about an incident when he was called in to protect a manufacturer's property from being attacked by workers: "From the depredations of a lawless Banditti of colliers and their wives, for the wives had lost their work to spinning engines.... they advanced at first with insolence, avowing their intention of cutting to pieces the machine lately introduced in the woollen manufacture; which they suppose, if generally adopted will lessen the demand for manual labour. The women became clamorous. The men were more open to conviction and after some expostulation were induced to desist from their purpose and return peaceably home". Source B: Fall In trade The commissioner of Patna wrote:
'It appears that twenty years ago a brisk trade was carried on in the manufacture of cloth at Jahanabad, and Behar, which has in the former place entirely ceased, while in the latter the amount of manufacture is very limited, in consequence of the cheap and durable goods from Manchester with which the native manufacturers arc unable to compete'.
Source C: The census report on the handloom Industry
Reporting on the Koshtis, a community of weavers, the Census Report of Central Provinces stated: 'the koshtis, like the weavers of the finer kinds of cloth in other parts of India have fallen upon evil times. They are unable to compete with the showy goods which Manchester sends in such profusion, and they have of late years emigrated in great numbers, chiefly to Berar. where as day labourers they arc able to obtain wages....' Source A: Protection of property (a) What was making the workers hostile? Source B: Fall In trade
(b) Why was there a fall in trade? Source C: The census report on the handloom Industry
(c) How did technology impact the handloom weavers?

Answer 1

Answer:

c mark me BRAINLIST I will follow you