Political Science, asked by prem66861, 11 months ago

Read this passage and answer the questions below:
"Broadly, non-alignment means not tying yourself off with military
blocs….It means trying to view things, as far as possible, not from
the military point of view, though that has to come in sometimes,
but independently, and trying to maintain friendly relations with all
countries." — JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(a) Why does Nehru want to keep off military blocs?
(b) Do you think that the Indo-Soviet friendship treaty violated the
principle of non-alignment? Give reasons for your answer.
(c) If there were no military blocs, do you think non-alignment would
have been unnecessary?

Answers

Answered by supersmartyme42
1

Answer:

he made this question is is repeated fifth time please don't unnecessarily repeated it

Answered by aburaihana123
0

Answer:

Answers to the questions on the passage are given below.

Explanation:

a. Nehru wanted not to favor a particular bloc. He wanted to friendly with all the nation of the world. He wanted to keep India unique internationally.

b. No, 'Indo-Soviet' friendship treaty did not violate the non-alignment principle because it was not related to military relation but promised to keep friendly relations amongst each other.

c. Yes, Non-Alignment not only meant keeping away from any blocs, but it also supported disarmament and terrorism.

Similar questions