Question

[Repost] Edition "Avengers: Endgame" :
The movie sucked when compared to infinity war. The only scene that was good was the part where Cap wields the hammer. Otherwise what a shítshow. No real explination for professor Hulk, dude just shows up and acts 'Mark Ruffalo humble' about shít. Whole movie felt like nothing but talk until that 1 huge battle. In comparison to the amazing pace of infinity war, Endgame's 'one big battle at the end' formula made it feel like Age of Ultron, which was also mediocre compared to 1st Avengers movie. But "Old man" Cap? Wow... just wow... and giving the shield to goddāmn Falcon? ... Did he get dementia and think that the shield was just a nomination for 'best supporting role in a drama' award? How the hell is Falcon gonna reign-in the other avengers? Even Rhoddy can challenge him for the title. Why not Hawkeye? I feel he could usher in a bunch of noob-avengers, but Falcon?
Furthermore, when prof. Hulk snapped, he could've tried to bring Loki back too. Why only Nat?? Just because Bruce and Nat felt something for each other doesn't make him any less friendzoned with Thor. Thor lost everyone he knew, atleast Loki could've been brought back. They hadn't justified him, Loki deserved better. And for good lord's sake, Loki's the best character in the whole of the MCU!! I pity his death.
What y'all think? Is Loki justified? Is Falcon eligible for welding the Shield or Bucky should've had that honour?​

Answer 1

Answer:

Loki is justified, I say bucky should have gotten the sheild honestly

Explanation:

I do agree Loki is the best in MCU, 100% my favorite.

UwU

Answer 2

I don't like the part.. Where Iron Man dies.. :((

Loki is indeed The best Character! right? I pity him too.. he wasn't Justified.

______________________________

You need to watch the Video, "How, Avengers Should have ended" On You Tube. It's for Avengers, Fans only. ;) and also, "How star wars should have ended"