✴️✴️ RIDDLE TIME ✴️✴️
【50 POINTS ٩(♡ε♡ )۶】
There was a man who was born before his father , killed his mother and married his sister . Yet , there was nothing wrong with what he had done . Why ?
thanq ♥️
Answers
Answered by
7
Answer:
The answer is in the sentence.
The commas are what sparks the confusion. Therefore the sentence could be re-written as: “There was a man who was born, BEFORE his father killed his mother and married his sister.”
At first one may think that the man was literally born before his father, and the man killed his own mother, and the man married his own sister.
Another person would read it as: the man was born BEFORE his father committed the crime of killing his own wife and marrying his daughter. Which can also be understood as the father killed the MAN’s mother AFTER he was born. The father then married the MAN’s sister.
Now it makes sense.
Therefore the man is not at fault here. It’s the father.
nupur90:
thx
Answered by
13
♥❤
✌
==>
His father was in front of him when he was born, therefore he was born before him. His mother died while giving birth to him. Finally, he grew up to be a minister and married his sister at her ceremony.
♥ __________(^_-)____________♥
❤❤
✌
==>
His father was in front of him when he was born, therefore he was born before him. His mother died while giving birth to him. Finally, he grew up to be a minister and married his sister at her ceremony.
♥ __________(^_-)____________♥
❤❤
Similar questions