Economy, asked by aradhygupta935, 6 months ago

rise of concrete jungle trend analysis least 40 to 50 pages ​

Answers

Answered by snehsingh20060116
32

Answer:

I hope it will help you......

Attachments:
Answered by mahitiwari89
2

Rise Of Concrete Jungle Trend

By 2050, 2.4 billion more people are expected to live in cities, making this century the urban century. This paper contends that, paradoxically, the urban century will fail if nature is not used. We examine three pieces of literature to determine the scientific support for this claim. First, economic studies show that cities are centres of productivity, innovation, and creativity because of their high potential for interaction. Second, many health studies show increased stress and a higher prevalence of some mental disorders in cities. Finally, we argue that the constant exchange of urban life causes this urban psychological penalty.

We show that 46 per cent of humans live in population densities, where global datasets indicate that this psychological penalty may be an issue. This fraction will only increase as urbanisation continues. Third, research on ecosystem services shows that even brief interactions with nature have mental health benefits, alleviating symptoms of this psychological penalty.

According to global data, only 13% of urban dwellers live close to nature to benefit from its mental health benefits. We argue that natural features in cities will be an essential part of the urban century, providing a way to have all the benefits of our urban, connected world while also making our urban home a place where we can thrive psychologically. Through Green Prescriptions and the Biophilic Cities Network, we discuss two specific ways governments attempt to integrate nature into citizens' lives.

Many aspects of human society will be profoundly altered by the urban century. Humans have practised building cities over the last few centuries, and they've learned that proper urban planning and adequate infrastructure can alleviate many of the urban health penalties. However, as argued in this essay, the urban psychological liability will be more difficult to overcome simply by adding more grey infrastructure. The increased pace of interaction and life that research has shown often leads to an urban psychological penalty is inherent in what makes cities such a productive way to organise society, what one writer called our species' most incredible invention.

According to growing scientific evidence, natural features in cities can mitigate a significant portion of the urban psychological penalty. Nature in cities enables us to reap the benefits of urbanisation while living in livable towns where we can thrive. For this reason, we refer to nature in cities as the "green soul of the concrete jungle" because the character has the potential to make cities more humane in the fundamental sense of meeting the needs of human well-being and happiness.

The role of ecosystem services in risk reduction and natural resource management is highlighted in the New Urban Agenda. These are important goals, but we believe natural features are also required to make our urban environment more humane. One of the New Urban Agenda's main goals was to "create cities that are just, safe, healthy, accessible, affordable, resilient, and sustainable." We believe access to and interaction with natural features is critical to meeting the New Urban Agenda's health goal. We risk creating a cruel, grey world for ourselves if we do not incorporate some nature into our cities. The urban century will fail without nature.

Despite mounting evidence that interaction with nature is critical for mental health, most cities are being built without it. According to global data, only 13% of urban dwellers are currently living in close enough proximity to nature to benefit their mental health. We believe another path could be taken to lead to a greener urban future.

However, policymakers must first recognise that access to and interaction with nature is a human right. We are not the first to make this claim, but our literature review suggests that we are increasing the urban psychological penalty for billions of people without a certain amount of nature. We argue that nature in cities should be viewed as a fundamental requirement for a functioning and healthy city rather than an amenity.

Learn More:-

Rise of concrete jungle trend:-

1. https://sustainableearth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42055-018-0002-5

2. https://brainly.in/question/29832838

#SPJ3

Similar questions