Economy, asked by tulikapathak24, 11 months ago

samuelson definition of economics is the most accepted definition of economics give two reasons for this​

Answers

Answered by muskan1618
7

Explanation:

Various definitions of 'economics' have been proposed, including the definition of 'economics' as "what economists do".[1]

The earlier term for 'economics' was political 'economy'. It is adapted from the French Mercantilist usage of économie politique, which extended economy from the ancient Greek term for household management to the national realm as public administration of the affairs of state.[2] Mister James Steuart (1767) wrote the first book in English with 'political economy' in the title, explaining that just as:

Economy in general [is] the art of providing for all the wants of a family, [so the science of political economy] seeks to secure a certain fund of subsistence for all the inhabitants, to obviate every circumstance which may render it precarious; to provide every thing necessary for supplying the wants of the society, and to employ the inhabitants ... in such manner as naturally to create reciprocal relations and dependencies between them, so as to supply one another with reciprocal wants.[3]

The title page gave as its subject matter "population, agriculture, trade, industry, money, coins, interest, circulation, banks, exchange, public credit and taxes".[3]

The philosopher Adam Smith (1776) defines the subject as "an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations," in particular as:

a branch of the science of a statesman or legislator [with the twofold objective of providing] a plentiful revenue or subsistence for the people ... [and] to supply the state or commonwealth with a revenue for the public services.[4]

J.B. Say (1803), distinguishing the subject from its public-policy uses, defines it as the science of production, distribution, and consumption of wealth.[5] On the satirical side, Thomas Carlyle (1849) coined 'the dismal science' as an epithet for classical economics, in this context, commonly linked to the pessimistic analysis of Malthus (1798).[6] John Stuart Mill (1844) defines the subject in a social context as:

The science which traces the laws of such of the phenomena of society as arise from the combined operations of mankind for the production of wealth, in so far as those phenomena are not modified by the pursuit of any other object.[7]

The shift from the social to the individual level appears within the main works of the Marginal Revolution. Carl Menger's definition reflects the focus on the economizing man:

For economic theory is concerned, not with practical rules for economic activity, but with the conditions under which men engage in provident activity directed to the satisfaction of their needs.[8]

William Stanley Jevons, another very influential author of the Marginal Revolution defines economics highlighting the hedonic and quantitative aspects of the science:

In this work I have attempted to treat Economy as a Calculus of Pleasure and Pain, and have sketched out, almost irrespective of previous opinions, the form which the science, as it seems to me, must ultimately take. I have long thought that as it deals throughout with quantities, it must be a mathematical science in matter if not in language.[9]

Alfred Marshall provides a still widely cited definition in his textbook Principles of Economics (1890) that extends analysis beyond wealth and from the societal to the microeconomic level, creating a certain synthesis of the views of those still more sympathetic with the classical political economy (with social wealth focus) and those early adopters of the views expressed in the Marginal Revolution (with individual needs focus). Marshall's inclusion of the expression wellbeing was also very significant to the discussion on the nature of economics:

Political Economy or Economics is a study of mankind in the ordinary business of life; it examines that part of individual and social action which is most closely connected with the attainment and with the use of the material requisites of wellbeing. Thus it is on the one side a study of wealth; and on the other, and more important side, a part of the study of man.[10]

Answered by ankushsaini23
6

Answer:

╔═══*.·:·.✧ ✦ ✧.·:·.*═══╗

YOUR ANSWER ❤️☟︎︎︎ ☟︎︎︎

╚═══*.·:·.✧ ✦ ✧.·:·.*═══╝

Economics is the social science that studies the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. Economics focuses on the behaviour and interactions of economic agents and how economies work.

________________________________

\mathcal {Hey \: user! \: You \: are \: selected \: as \: the}

\mathcal {lucky \: user \: to \: get \: inbox, \: please \: tell}

\mathcal {me \: the \: timings \: you \: free \: on \: Monday}

\mathcal {between \: 9:00am \: and \: 01:00pm}

\mathcal {in \: the \: form \: of \: answer \: of \: my \: question}

  • mark as brainlist....
  • stay home STAY SAFE...

◉◈✿。 [♛ ItzÀÑKŪŠH ♛] 。✿◈◉

XOᙠNI ɹoɟ xuɐɥʇ 0⇂

Similar questions