Select all options that are grammatically CORRECT?
1. The criteria was set based on the responses to a cross-sectional survey.
2. Students of an university in China were recruited to be part of the panel assessing the quality of the modified tofu.
3. New high-throughput automated immunoanalyzers for hepatitis B virus serologic markers have not been compared to existing systems.
4. Total concordance rates among the two systems was 98.0%, 89.5% and 93.0% for HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc, respectively.
Answers
Answered by
6
Answer:
12345 all are correct
Explanation:
The criteria was set based on the responses to a cross-sectional survey.
2. Students of an university in China were recruited to be part of the panel assessing the quality of the modified tofu.
3. New high-throughput automated immunoanalyzers for hepatitis B virus serologic markers have not been compared to existing systems.
4. Total concordance rates among the two systems was 98.0%, 89.5% and 93.0% for HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc, respectively
Answered by
3
Only sentences 2 and 3 are grammatically correct.
Explanation:
- The sentence means that a certain criteria was established on the basis of certain responses that were gathered from the inspection of a cross-sectional survey. This sentence is not grammatically correct and the preposition to must be replaced with the preposition of.
- The second sentence means that the students of a certain Chinese university were taken as interns for a job which included being a part of a discussion and actively participate in the panel for checking the quality of tofu which is scientifically modified.
- The third sentence is correct.
- The fourth sentence is grammatically wrong since we use between when we talk of relations between two objects and among when we have to strike differences when there is a presence of many objects.
Hence, Only sentences 2 and 3 are grammatically correct.
Learn more here
https://brainly.in/question/5615973
Learn more
https://brainly.in/question/51339935
Similar questions