Question

Select the correct answer.
How do these passages differ in their ideas about the Magnuson Fishery and Conservation Act?

A.
The author of the first passage believes that the Act is damaging, and the author of the second passage agrees with this idea.
B.
The first author warns that the Act is insufficient, while the second author argues that it may be too strict.
C.
The second author believes that the Act is helpful for international fisheries, while the first author believes it is helpful for U.S. fisheries.
D.
The first author believes that the Act is helpful in protecting our waters from foreign fisheries. The second author disagrees.

Answer 1

Answers: The first author warns that the Act is insufficient, while the second author argues that it may be too strict.

Explanation:

I took the test and got it correct! Have a great day :)

(The one above me is wrong, it says it's c but he marked a different answer. The one I know it correct) Both the authors have given different perspectives and shared distinct opinions on the Magnusson act. There are different facts and figures which have been put forward by both the writers supporting respective opinions. The later considers this act and its regulations may affect fisheries and its overall supply while the former considers this act as an insufficient one.

Answer 2

Answer:

B.The first author warns that the Act is insufficient, while the second author argues that it may be too strict.

Explanation:

I got it right on my test