Question

select two tv channel who provide opposite narrative of political scenarios.write down a short report of who did you notice the difference of opinion and what is your conclusion on the issue​

Answer 1

Three of these channels hardly changed their panel of ‘experts’ or the slant of their emphases. The other four, while basically keeping the coverage in favour of the viewpoints of the dharna leaders, at least shifted panellists with alternative perspectives but kept the balance still disproportionate. One other channel, recently formally charged with and punished for ‘treason’, was a rare one that took the completely opposite side in the political battle: that against the PAT in general and the PTI in particular. The only channel that had mostly government perspectives was state-owned and government-managed PTV. Bottomline: one has had to work hard to find discussions shorn of rhetorical flourishes, intentional confusion and patented bias.

In this backdrop, when Mr Khan and Dr Qadri led their followers towards PM House and violence ensued, within 50 hours at least 21 journalists and media workers had been assaulted and an office of a TV channel was attacked seven times. Another, PTV, was run over and ransacked..

keep growing ‍♀️

Answer 2

Comparison of Opposing Narratives on Political Issues between Fox News and CNN

• Fox News and CNN are two TV channels that often have opposite narratives on political issues. Fox News is generally considered to be more conservative and supportive of Republican policies, while CNN is considered to be more liberal and supportive of Democratic policies.

• One example of a political issue where the two channels have different narratives is the 2020 presidential election. Fox News generally presented a narrative that the election was stolen from Donald Trump and that there was widespread voter fraud. CNN, on the other hand, reported that the election was fair and that Joe Biden won the election.

• Another example is the narrative of the COVID-19 pandemic and the response of the government. Fox News often criticized the measures taken by the government and the scientific community, while CNN reported on the scientific evidence and the need for action to stop the spread of the virus.

• It's important to note that these are generalizations and that individual segments or anchors on the channels may have different views. Additionally, it's also important to be aware of the potential biases of any news outlet and to consult with multiple sources for a more accurate understanding of the issues.

In conclusion, it is important to consider the source of information and to be aware of potential biases when consuming news and forming opinions on political issues. It is always a good idea to consult with multiple sources and to fact-check information to gain a more accurate understanding of the issues.

#SPJ3