English, asked by peeyush12997, 2 months ago

• Selling Tobacco should be banned essay​

Answers

Answered by intelligent567
1

Answer:

Apart from reducing human suffering, abolishing the sale of cigarettes would result in savings in the realm of healthcare costs, increased labour productivity, lessened harms from fires, reduced consumption of scarce physical resources, and a smaller global carbon footprint.

Answered by naqibazraf2011
2

However, tobacco and cigarette manufacturing nations will lose a lot if smoking was to be banned. I, therefore, think that it should not be banned. Some nations largely depend on exporting cigarettes and tobacco products to get revenue.

This revenue normally boosts the economy of such nations. If smoking was to be banned, it means that they will incur great losses since tobacco companies are multi-billion organizations. Apart from these, millions of people will be rendered jobless as a result of the ban.

The process in which tobacco and cigarette products reach consumers is very complex, and it involves a chain process with several people involved in it. Banning smoking, therefore, means these people will lose their jobs for which most of them may be depending upon for their livelihoods.

In conclusion, the ban on smoking is a very hard step to be undertaken, especially when the number of worldwide users is in billions. Although it places a large burden on nations in treating diseases associated with smoking, it may take a very long time before a ban can work. Attempts by some nations to do this have often been met with failures.

Similar questions