Shekher/Kareena is allergic to tobacco smoke and wants a complete ban on
smoking in public places. Though some places have banned smoking in
public places, the ban cannot be effective until the smokers themselves
decide to give up the habit. Using your own ideas, write an article in not more
than 200 words on the evils of smoking.
Best of luck
Don't want any spam
Answers
Answer:
Smoking is injurious to health is a well known slogan that everybody knows. But smoking is growing in our country. You find the incidence so common every second or third person is smoking cigarette or beedi. Smoking spells ruin to one’s health. It opens the gateway to ill, of physical down fall and speedy death. Tobacco consumption can cause cancer of mouth, throat and lungs. About 50% of cancer cases in India are related to tobacco consumption. 80% of heart attack patients less than 40 years of age are chronic smokers.
Elderly people have seen smoking. Sometimes young ones are asked prepare a hookah. Thus, young people allude to smoking. They try to follow their seniors. Again, young men can help non-smoker friends to be addicted to smoking. In this way, smoking spreads everywhere.
Smoking, as the doctors say, has no merit at all. It is full of demerits. It causes incurable disease like cancer. It attacks lungs. A poison called nicotine is in tobacco. This nicotine enters into lungs and mixes with the blood of the body and causes different diseases like bronchitis, asthma, heart disease and gastric ulcer etc.
To prevent smoking, its bad sides should be published in different media. Non-smoking Zones like school, colleges, buses, hospitals etc. should be increased. If all offices Govt. and non-Govt. and non-Govt. are declared non-smoking zones. It will be a great step forward for the prevention of smoking. Those who cannot give up smoking should not smoke openly. They should make in a private place.
Smoking is a habit which cannot be given up easily. So, measures should be taken to discourage people to be newly addicted to smoking. Import and production of tobacco should be dissuaded. Slogans against smoking may be inserted on packets of necessary things. Smokers should be heated. Govt. should comforter boldly to give up revenue that accrues from tobacco.
_______________✌
Explanation:
"Even breathing in low doses of cigarette smoke can increase one's risk of heart attack," said David Meyers, M.D., M.P.H., professor of Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine and lead investigator of the study, which is the most comprehensive analysis of related studies to date. "Public smoking bans seem to be tremendously effective in reducing heart attack and, theoretically, might also help to prevent lung cancer and emphysema, diseases that develop much more slowly than heart attacks. The cardiac benefits increased with longer ban duration."
According to projections by the authors, a nationwide ban on public smoking could prevent as many as 154,000 heart attacks each year. These findings are particularly important in light of mounting evidence that second-hand smoke exposure is nearly as harmful to the heart as chronic active smoking. Direct smoking doubles the risk of heart attack. Second hand smoke increases the risk by 30 percent.
"Interestingly, public smoking bans had a stronger effect in reducing heart attacks among women and younger individuals, which may be explained, in part, because younger people tend to frequent clubs, restaurants and bars where smoking is a likely part of the social scene," said Dr. Meyers. "Heavily exposed people like those working in the entertainment or hospitality industries are likely to accrue the greatest benefit from smoking bans."
Dr. Meyers adds that smoking remains the leading preventable risk factor for heart attack. Secondhand smoke is thought to increase the likelihood of a heart attack by making the blood "sticky" and more prone to clotting, reducing the amount of "good" (HDL) cholesterol in the body, and putting individuals at greater risk for dangerous heart rhythms, among other factors.
The good news is that the beneficial effects of smoking bans appear to be fairly immediate, with declines in reported heart attack cases within 3 months. The impact of bans was strengthened if compliance was good, if baseline smoking prevalence was low and if air quality was good.
"Several years ago, the idea that secondhand smoke was harmful to the heart was a theory and one with some controversy attached, but this article moves us from the theoretical to fact and to practice. The reduction in heart attacks associated with public smoking bans is a big deal," said Steven Schroeder, M.D., director, Smoking Cessation Leadership Center University of California, San Francisco. "While cardiologists routinely screen for lipid disorders and high blood pressure, they also need to become vigilant about asking patients about tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure and provide counseling as needed."
Drs. Meyers and Schroeder encourage clinicians to support community smoking bans and other tobacco control measures including tax increases on cigarettes, expanded cessation services including telephone quitlines and educational campaigns. So far, bans on smoking in public places and workplaces have been instituted in 32 states and many cities across the country. As the United States increasingly institutes policies to protect nonsmokers from second hand smoke, authors say these efforts will yield great public health benefits in the form of reduced disease, disability and deaths.
The researchers performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 reports from 11 geographic locations in the United States (MT, CO, NY, IN, OH), Canada and Europe to compare the rates of heart attacks before and after public smoking bans were instituted. Collectively, the studies involved 24 million people and observations of the effect of the bans ranged from two months to three years