English, asked by dipalidhumal967, 3 months ago

Sherlock Holmes let James Ryder get away even after the crime he committed. If you were the detective who found him guilty, what would you have done? Give reasons for your answer.

please answers I will mark you as brainliest plz answer fast........​

Attachments:

Answers

Answered by tgunjan052
18

Answer:

Ryder is the thief who is found to have stolen the blue carbuncle in "The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle." However, at the end of the story after Ryder has confessed himself and begged, "God help me! God help me!", Holmes seems moved by compassion and tells the man to get out of his flat, without making any move to prosecute Ryder. He explains to Watson that he is doing this because he does not believe that it is his responsibility to "supply the deficiencies" of the police, and moreover, the failure to prosecute Ryder cannot result in the conviction of another innocent man. He feels that Ryder has been "too terribly frightened" by this case to continue on and commit any other crime, b

Answered by rajgaikwad1228
0

Answer:

Answer:

Ryder is the thief who is found to have stolen the blue carbuncle in "The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle." However, at the end of the story after Ryder has confessed himself and begged, "God help me! God help me!", Holmes seems moved by compassion and tells the man to get out of his flat, without making any move to prosecute Ryder. He explains to Watson that he is doing this because he does not believe that it is his responsibility to "supply the deficiencies" of the police, and moreover, the failure to prosecute Ryder cannot result in the conviction of another innocent man. He feels that Ryder has been "too terribly frightened" by this case to continue on and commit any other crime,

Explanation:

This answer is Correct

Similar questions