Shhow that prime number of the form 4n+3 can not be expressed as the sum of two squares.
Please dont give any silly answer . Because of silly answers I will not get right answer.
Answers
Answered by
0
Proof: a2−1=(a−1)(a+1). Since a is odd, both a−1 and a+1 are even, so that a2−1 is divisible by 4. ■
Lemma 2: a
is even ⟹ a2≡0(mod4)
.
Proof: Trivial. ■
Now, suppose that u=a2+b2
.
(1) If both a
and b are even, then u
is divisible by four by lemma 2.
(2) If both a
and b are odd, then u≡2(mod4)
by lemma 1.
(3) If a
is even and b is odd (wlog), then u≡1(mod4)
by lemmas 1 and 2.
That is, it is never the case that u≡3(mod4)
.
Lemma 2: a
is even ⟹ a2≡0(mod4)
.
Proof: Trivial. ■
Now, suppose that u=a2+b2
.
(1) If both a
and b are even, then u
is divisible by four by lemma 2.
(2) If both a
and b are odd, then u≡2(mod4)
by lemma 1.
(3) If a
is even and b is odd (wlog), then u≡1(mod4)
by lemmas 1 and 2.
That is, it is never the case that u≡3(mod4)
.
Anonymous:
Dear Read question carefully.....
Answered by
2
Heya!!!
Here's ur answer..
Hope it may help you...
Thank you :) :))
Here's ur answer..
Hope it may help you...
Thank you :) :))
Attachments:
Similar questions