Question

Short essay on the topic technology making society alive

Answer 1

According to “Richard Byrne, “founding faculty” on the “Annenberg School for Communication”, in his speech while accepting the “communicator” award from “Media & Values” stated: “These are transforming technologies. But the technology is not the transformation. It's our relationship with one another that's undergoing transformation. And I do believe it's a transformation; I don't think it's just a change.”  -Richard Byrne

It is not the technology that is making the society alive, it is the people.  They are changing and they are excited about the new inventions made and which are handy in use.  The people who want to get familiarized with these inventions are learning the operations of new gadgets. But, are they changing because of this? Yes, they are becoming more glued into the accessories than moving with people.

Is it alive? It varies from people to people.  People who are interested in getting new contacts, new business opportunities and new information are actively involved in it.  Others, who are not interested in these are not bothered by these changes.  So, What Richard Byrne said is true.

Answer 2

Technology plays an imperative part in the general improvement of a nation. For example, Israel did not have regular assets to support its economy. There was no oil or minerals. Nothing.

Human technological development is both characteristic and one of a kind to every individual, prenatally to after death as one a player in an entire being. Although billions might be conveyed at a similar clock times, they are never ALL the same in a country state limited zone, in a country of indispensable and deceased perpetual occupants.

You can't have a gross "developer" of anything at all without that Whole Wealth range officially occupied. You need to lay out the Land drawing first before lettering in the Nation name among Nations United by 1941 and later contracts. Those now include particular proprietors and protectors with atomic power who have pronounced a conclusion to non-attendant colonization completely.

In such manner, technological proposals about gross development must be convincing to draw the consideration of technological thinkers who might need to know in advance the NET worth of the particular proposer's assets.