Question

shortcomings of traditional approach to the study of comparative politics ? 200 words please help​

Answer 1

Answer:

• The traditional approaches do not give much information regarding the role of the individuals in politics. Their focus is more towards the institutions.
• Traditional approaches have a descriptive nature.
• The traditional approach does not give much information regarding the interdependence of national and international politics.
• The traditional approach only limits itself to historical analysis without delving much into the the study of political structures.
• The traditional approach does not talk much about the social life of the people and their connection to political life.

Explanation:

The modern comparative studies of politics draws conclusion from factual data. The modern studies explain more than the political structures and their historical analysis. There are many approaches used for making comparisons in the modern approach being interlinked with other subjects. The modern approach uses the Sociological approach, psychological approach, economics approach, quantitative approach, the systems approach, behavioral approach, simulation approach and more to describe the dependence on politics.  

The study of modern comparative politics is more systematical which studies the infrastructure of politics with comparative Politics. It studies the real behavior of individuals, group structures, subsystems and systems in relation to their environment. It studies the behavior of all institutions. It studies politics and makes comparisons with the help of other social science like psychology, sociology, anthropology, and economics to explain its systems.