Question

Should scientists be socially responsible? (pros and cons)

Answer 1

Answer:

The concept of "corporate social responsibility" has become pervasive enough that it has earned its own acronym in business circles: CSR. The term means that a corporation should be accountable to a community, as well as to shareholders, for its actions and operations. When a corporation adopts a CSR policy, it aims to demonstrate a goal of upholding ethical values, as well as respecting people, communities and the environment. The corporation undertakes to monitor its compliance with its stated CSR policy and report this with the same frequency that it reports its financial results.

Explanation:

thanks add me as brainliest

Answer 2

Scientists should be socially responsible and too much protocol following can lead to stagnation in science.  

Explanation:

• Broadly speaking scientists and their works must be socially responsible. This is because when scientists experiment with technologies that might create massive disruption if they fall on the wrong hands, that would lead to damage to our environment and societies.
• However, at the same time, science must progress at its own speed and in order to discover new things it is crucial that scientists should be given complete freedom.

Learn more about the Scientists:

What are technologies and instruments used by the scientists to get information about the earth's interior?

https://brainly.in/question/6911

Data scientists store and process large sets of numerical data. How do functions make their work easier?

https://brainly.in/question/11192663