show that √3 is an irrational
Answers
Answered by
4
Let us assume that √3 is a rational number.
then, as we know a rational number should be in the form of p/q
where p and q are co- prime number.
So,
√3 = p/q { where p and q are co- prime}
√3q = p
Now, by squaring both the side
we get,
(√3q)² = p²
3q² = p² ........ ( i )
So,
if 3 is the factor of p²
then, 3 is also a factor of p ..... ( ii )
=> Let p = 3m { where m is any integer }
squaring both sides
p² = (3m)²
p² = 9m²
putting the value of p² in equation ( i )
3q² = p²
3q² = 9m²
q² = 3m²
So,
if 3 is factor of q²
then, 3 is also factor of q
Since
3 is factor of p & q both
So, our assumption that p & q are co- prime is wrong
hence,. √3 is an irrational number
then, as we know a rational number should be in the form of p/q
where p and q are co- prime number.
So,
√3 = p/q { where p and q are co- prime}
√3q = p
Now, by squaring both the side
we get,
(√3q)² = p²
3q² = p² ........ ( i )
So,
if 3 is the factor of p²
then, 3 is also a factor of p ..... ( ii )
=> Let p = 3m { where m is any integer }
squaring both sides
p² = (3m)²
p² = 9m²
putting the value of p² in equation ( i )
3q² = p²
3q² = 9m²
q² = 3m²
So,
if 3 is factor of q²
then, 3 is also factor of q
Since
3 is factor of p & q both
So, our assumption that p & q are co- prime is wrong
hence,. √3 is an irrational number
Answered by
1
The number 3–√3 is irrational ,it cannot be expressed as a ratio of integers a and b. To prove that this statement is true, let us Assume that it is rational and then prove it isn't (Contradiction).
So the Assumptions states that :
(1) 3–√=ab3=ab
Where a and b are 2 integers
Now since we want to disapprove our assumption in order to get our desired result, we must show that there are no such two integers.
Squaring both sides give :
3=a2b23=a2b2
3b2=a23b2=a2
(Note : If bb is odd then b2b2 is Odd, then a2a2is odd because a2=3b2a2=3b2 (3 times an odd number squared is odd) and Ofcourse a is odd too, because oddnumber−−−−−−−−−√oddnumber is also odd.
With a and b odd, we can say that :
a=2x+1a=2x+1
b=2y+1b=2y+1
Where x and y must be integer values, otherwise obviously a and b wont be integer.
Substituting these equations to 3b2=a23b2=a2gives :
3(2y+1)2=(2x+1)23(2y+1)2=(2x+1)2
3(4y2+4y+1)=4x2+4x+13(4y2+4y+1)=4x2+4x+1
Then simplying and using algebra we get:
6y2+6y+1=2x2+2x6y2+6y+1=2x2+2x
You should understand that the LHS is an odd number.
6y2+6y6y2+6y is even Always, so +1 to an even number gives an ODD number.
The RHS side is an even number. (Similar Reason)
2x2+2x2x2+2x is even Always, and there is NO +1 like there was in the LHS to make it ODD.
There are no solutions to the equation because of this.
Therefore, integer values of a and b which satisfy the relationship = abab cannot be found.
Therefore 3–√3 is irrational
Mark it as brainliest
So the Assumptions states that :
(1) 3–√=ab3=ab
Where a and b are 2 integers
Now since we want to disapprove our assumption in order to get our desired result, we must show that there are no such two integers.
Squaring both sides give :
3=a2b23=a2b2
3b2=a23b2=a2
(Note : If bb is odd then b2b2 is Odd, then a2a2is odd because a2=3b2a2=3b2 (3 times an odd number squared is odd) and Ofcourse a is odd too, because oddnumber−−−−−−−−−√oddnumber is also odd.
With a and b odd, we can say that :
a=2x+1a=2x+1
b=2y+1b=2y+1
Where x and y must be integer values, otherwise obviously a and b wont be integer.
Substituting these equations to 3b2=a23b2=a2gives :
3(2y+1)2=(2x+1)23(2y+1)2=(2x+1)2
3(4y2+4y+1)=4x2+4x+13(4y2+4y+1)=4x2+4x+1
Then simplying and using algebra we get:
6y2+6y+1=2x2+2x6y2+6y+1=2x2+2x
You should understand that the LHS is an odd number.
6y2+6y6y2+6y is even Always, so +1 to an even number gives an ODD number.
The RHS side is an even number. (Similar Reason)
2x2+2x2x2+2x is even Always, and there is NO +1 like there was in the LHS to make it ODD.
There are no solutions to the equation because of this.
Therefore, integer values of a and b which satisfy the relationship = abab cannot be found.
Therefore 3–√3 is irrational
Mark it as brainliest
Similar questions