Question

SILLY ANSWERS WILL BE REPORTED.Only those who support theory of relativity and having well knowledge about this theory should answer this question. einstein was wrong with his relativity theory.
1. Physics ends where infinity begins. Black holes are space-time points where quantum field equation gives solution as infinity. Black goles are only speculations. In physical terms all quantities shouldnt have infinite value.
2. Quantum field equation is built by matrices thats having undefined values on both sides...if both the matrices gave its weird solution equation becomes nonsense.
3.quantum entanglement gives probability of particle having speed than light..which should be impossible. Here his theory of entanglement contradicts his own speculations.
NOW EXPLAIN THIS 3 POINTS IN HIS SUPPORT. AND ALSO THOUROUGHLY EXPLAIN WHY WE SHOULD BELIEVE HIS THEORY INSPITE OF ALL THIS SERIOUS DRAWBACKS.

Answer 1

In the real universe, no black holes contain singularities. In general, singularities are the non-physical mathematical result of a flawed physical theory. When scientists talk about black hole singularities, they are talking about the errors that appear in our current theories and not about objects that actually exist. When scientists and non-scientists talk about singularities as if they really exist, they are simply displaying their ignorance.



A singularity is a point in space where there is a mass with infinite density. This would lead to a spacetime with an infinite curvature. Singularities are predicted to exist in black holes by Einstein's theory of general relativity, which is a theory that has done remarkably well at matching experimental results. The problem is that infinities never exist in the real world. Whenever an infinity pops out of a theory, it is simply a sign that your theory is too simple to handle extreme cases.

For example, consider the simplest physical model that accurately describes how waves travel on a guitar string. If you drive such a string at its resonant frequency, the simplest model predicts that the vibration of the string will increase exponentially with time, even if you are driving it gently. The string actually does this... up to a point. The problem is that the exponential function quickly approaches infinity. The model therefore predicts that a guitar string driven at its resonant frequency will, in time, vibrate passed the moon, passed the stars, out to infinity, and then back. Does the string actually vibrate infinitely just because the model says so? Of course not. The string snaps long before vibrating out to the moon. The appearance of the infinity in the model therefore indicates that the model has reached its limitations.