similarities between hieroglyphics and cuniform writing system and differences
Answers
Answer:
hello friend make me brilliant
Explanation:
Egyptian hieroglyphs and cuneiform are both logographic scripts. Hieroglyphs are written as an abjad. Cuneiform is written as a syllabary. ... Cuneiform was adopted as a writing system by such phylogenetically diverse languages as the language isolate of Sumerian and the Indo-European languages of Hittite and Old Persian.
Answer:
Hieroglyphic and cuneiform writing are species of the broader category of logographic writing, which consists of symbolic characters that represent particular sounds in a language. In hieroglyphic writing, for example, the Horus glyph
represents the cluster hr (or hry) in Ancient Egyptian. Hieroglyphs were written with an abjad, or a script without distinct signs denoting vowels. Scholarly reconstructions of Ancient Egyptian illustrate that the above sign bore the pronunciation Ḥāru, but a paleographic analysis would not yield similar conclusions, since the sign itself is transliterated in the Demotic script as hr. The reading of abjads by native speakers is primarily defined by intuition and inferences as to the placement of vowels in forming contextually relevant words.
While hieroglyphic writing is a consonant-centered abjad, the cuneiform script is a syllabaic, logographic script. As with the hiragana and katakana of Japanese, each character in cuneiform represents a particular consonant-vowel combination. Unlike Egyptian hieroglyphics, cuneiform proliferated among numerous linguistically-distinct states and societies, thus requiring additional parsimony in transliterating the linguistic permutations of a particular glyph.