Situation : In the past few years, television reporters have started using tiny hidden video cameras to carry out undercover investigations. In many of these investigations, the reporter takes on a false identity. For example, for one story a reporter got a job in the meat department of a grocery store. This reporter then took secret videos of the manager telling employees to put barbecue sauce on old, rotting meat so they could put it on sale again. Another reporter pretended to be a high school student for several weeks to get secret videos of students buying and selling drugs at school.
Discussion :
• What other types of undercover investigations have you heard of?
• Do you think these types of investigations are a good idea? Why or why not? • Do you think that reporters have a right to take secret videos of people who are breaking the law?
Answers
sorry i can't give the answer
Answer:
I have heard of many undercover investigations like taking secret videos of people who are suspicious in the eyes of police or any kind of investigation department.
These type of investigation are a good idea. To catch criminals who are not getting caught by the police or undercover officers it is usefull and helps them to catch the criminals easily with proof. I don't know if reporters have the right to take secret videos of people. In my opinion it's good for catching criminals sometimes somethings which are not supposed to be taken are secretly recorded and used to blackmail people.
It is definitely a good idea to catch criminals with proof but I don't think it's right for anyone to take secret videos of the other person. They definitely can take videos if they have the permission of higher positioned people like DGP, DIG or ACP
Explanation:
this is my opinion