Six limitations of archeological evidence
Answers
Answer:Archaeology Is Not an Exact Science
Unlike physics or mathematics, archaeology is not an exact science. There are subjective elements in the analysis and interpretation of the data. Two people, using the same data, may arrive at different conclusions. In fact, this is exactly what we find with many of the sites that have been excavated. This should make us cautious about citing what a certain archaeologist concluded since their conclusions can never be placed on the same level as a mathematical certainty.
Everything That Has Been Left Behind Has Been Left by Accident
It must be remembered that everything that has survived from the ancient world has survived by accident. The material was not purposely left or hidden to be found thousands of years later. Consequently, what we find on a particular site is only there because it was the last remnants left by the particular peoples. With few exceptions, there was no plan to leave this material behind.
Only a Small Amount of Data from the Past Has Been Recovered
This point cannot be overemphasized. The discipline of biblical archaeology only deals with an extremely small amount of material which is potentially available for study. Our knowledge of the ancient world is tremendously limited. Only a small amount of the material that once existed is presently available for study. There are a number of points that should be made.
Explanation:Hope you understand :) Happy republic day
Answer:
dentification of the artifacts and features used in ceramic manufacture has become a crucial aspect of Southwestern archaeology as the organization of pottery production has assumed a pivotal role in current models of Southwestern prehistory. Regrettably, pottery-making and pottery-firing areas seldom are reported, and reliable criteria for inferring their presence at archaeological sites have not been developed. A review of pertinent ethnoarchaeological and experimental literature provides some correlates for identifying artifacts and features that may have been involved in ceramic production. Presently, it appears that only two Southwestern sites, Snaketown on the Gila River and AZ I:1:17(ASM) south of Grand Canyon National Park, have disclosed convincing evidence of on-site pottery-making and pottery-firing areas. Some recommendations are developed for increasing the likelihood of recovering strong evidence of ceramic production at Southwestern sites.
Explanation: plzzzzzzzz mark as brainliest...