Question

Skramari owes R$ 30,000 to Velmurgan, so he executed a promissory note in favor of
Sidhamani. Immediately after execution of this promissory note Sikhamani convicted for a criminal
offence and he acquitted after 4 years. Now Sikhamani wants to recover the debt from Velmurgan
on the basis of promissory note. Can he do so?​

Answer 1

Answer:

Cites 10 docs - [View All]

Section 91 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 91 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Sheo Nath Prasad vs Sarjoo Nonia And Anr. on 12 March, 1943

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Citedby 8 docs - [View All]

Kehar Singh & Ors vs Chanan Singh & Ors on 14 December, 1967

Against The Judgment In Os ... vs By Adv. Sri.Peeyus A.Kottam on 20 December, 2003

Ganga Ram vs Keshava Deo And Anr. on 17 May, 1958

Khitish Chandra Sahu vs Rajkishore Sahu on 22 March, 1979

Chandra Sekhar Misra vs Gobinda Chandra Das on 21 April, 1965

Answer 2

Answer:

Skramari owes R$ 30,000 to Velmurgan, so he executed a promissory note in favor of

Sidhamani. Immediately after execution of this promissory note Sikhamani convicted for a criminal

offence and he acquitted after 4 years. Now Sikhamani wants to recover the debt from Velmurgan

on the basis of promissory note. Can he do so?