slove this in method...
Attachments:
![](https://hi-static.z-dn.net/files/d7d/ee37178b410efdbbcc6a1bafd8c48edb.jpg)
Answers
Answered by
2
heya .
I think it is converse of Thales theorm.
given-A triangle ABC and a line intersecting AB at D and AC at D.
such that AD/DB=AE/EC
to prove __DE//BC
proofe-- if possible ,let DE is not parallel to BC then ,there must be another line through D ,which is parallel to BC ,let DE//BC
then by Thales theorm we have,
AD/DB=AF/FC
But AD/DB=AE/EC(given)
from1 )and 2) we get
AF/FC=AE/EC
adding 1 on both side .
then AFFC/FC=AE/EC/EC
=Ac/Fc=Ac/EC =1/FC=1/EC
=FC=EC
this is possible only when E and F coincide
hence DE//BC.
hope it help you..
@rajukumar .
I think it is converse of Thales theorm.
given-A triangle ABC and a line intersecting AB at D and AC at D.
such that AD/DB=AE/EC
to prove __DE//BC
proofe-- if possible ,let DE is not parallel to BC then ,there must be another line through D ,which is parallel to BC ,let DE//BC
then by Thales theorm we have,
AD/DB=AF/FC
But AD/DB=AE/EC(given)
from1 )and 2) we get
AF/FC=AE/EC
adding 1 on both side .
then AFFC/FC=AE/EC/EC
=Ac/Fc=Ac/EC =1/FC=1/EC
=FC=EC
this is possible only when E and F coincide
hence DE//BC.
hope it help you..
@rajukumar .
Attachments:
![](https://hi-static.z-dn.net/files/dc3/503c3a27869763c8fcfc7a682b32eebe.jpg)
Answered by
1
Hope this helps you
pls mark as brainliest
pls mark as brainliest
Attachments:
![](https://hi-static.z-dn.net/files/d2b/5d52c8ab65e0fb5eab4e234c5fb9952e.jpg)
Hemamalini15:
welcome
Similar questions