Social Sciences, asked by Anonymous, 10 months ago

social difference does not lead to social division. analyse the statement​

Answers

Answered by killergirl1681
48

Explanation:

Hii mate ❣️

Here is your answer :

❇️Every social differences does not lead to social division:

✳️Social differences divide similar people from one another, but they also unite very different people.

. ✳️People belonging to different social groups share differences and similarities cutting across the boundaries of their groups.

❇️For example: Carlos and Smith were similar in one way with Norman but different in other ways.

Hope it will help you ❣️

✴️Follow me ✴️

Answered by scienceworm1
1

&lt;body bgcolor=blue&gt;&lt;font color=pink&gt;</p><p>&lt;marquee behaviour="slide" direction="up"</p><p></p><p>

Social differences are the situations where people are discriminated against on the basis of social, economic, and racial inequality. On the other hand, social division means division of society on the basis of social differences like language, region, caste, colour, race and sex.

If social differences in a society overlap with each other it may lead to social division and if one social difference is given preference then people would begin to think that they belong to different community. For example, dalits in India are poor, landless and also victims of caste system.

Every social difference does not lead to social division. It is because: Social differences may divide similar people from one another, but they also unite very different people. ... For example, the Catholics and Protestants had some social differences, but later they were then able to patch up their differences.

&lt;marquee scrollamount=1300&gt;</p><p>hope it helped u </p><p>&lt;/marquee&gt;

Similar questions