Solve for all N > 2.
Answers
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a decent (and probably long) exercise.
For some n∈N , we want to show that
Fn=234⋯(n−1)n−−√−−−−−−−−−√−−−−−−−−−−−−−−√−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−√−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−⎷<3
(Denote by Fn the value of this expression)
We begin by observing that this can be rewritten as the finite product
Fn=1⋅212⋅3122⋅4123⋯n12n−1
=∏k=0n−1(k+1)12k
Here, an important realisation is that (k+1)12k>1 for all k≥1 , then it might help if we consider the infinite product of Fn since
∏k=0n−1(k+1)12k<∏k=0∞(k+1)12k
Now, we will show that F∞<3 . This in turn, would imply Fn<3 for all n∈N . Though before this, we simplify the product F∞ by writing it as an infinite series via taking natural logarithm both sides. This yields
lnF∞=∑k=0∞ln(1+k)2k =∑k=1∞ln(1+k)2k
Here, the main idea is to find a strong upper bound for this tedious sum. To do this, we consider another inequality (which will immediately become relevant to our case). For all n∈N , we have
n3≤3n
(with the equality holding only if n=3 )
This can be easily shown by induction (by noting that
Answer:
The main changes were:
This is a decent (and probably long) exercise.
For some n∈Nn∈N , we want to show that
Fn=234⋯(n−1)n−−√−−−−−−−−−√−−−−−−−−−−−−−−√−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−√−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−⎷<3Fn=234⋯(n−1)n<3
(Denote by FnFn the value of this expression)
We begin by observing that this can be rewritten as the finite product
Fn=1⋅212⋅3122⋅4123⋯n12n−1Fn=1⋅212⋅3122⋅4123⋯n12n−1
=∏k=0n−1(k+1)12k =∏k=0n−1(k+1)12k
Here, an important realisation is that (k+1)12k>1(k+1)12k>1 for all k≥1k≥1 , then it might help if we consider the infinite product of FnFn since
∏k=0n−1(k+1)12k<∏k=0∞(k+1)12k∏k=0n−1(k+1)12k<∏k=0∞(k+1)12k
Now, we will show that F∞<3F∞<3 . This in turn, would imply Fn<3Fn<3 for all n∈Nn∈N . Though before this, we simplify the product F∞F∞ by writing it as an infinite series via taking natural logarithm both sides. This yields
lnF∞=∑k=0∞ln(1+k)2k =∑k=1∞ln(1+k)2klnF∞=∑k=0∞ln(1+k)2k =∑k=1∞ln(1+k)2k
Here, the main idea is to find a strong upper bound for this tedious sum. To do this, we consider another inequality (which will immediately become relevant to our case). For all n∈Nn∈N , we have
n3≤3nn3≤3n
(with the equality holding only if n=3n=3 )
This can be easily shown by induction (by noting that
(n+1)3=n3(1+1n)3<3n3<3⋅3n=3n+1(n+1)3=n3(1+1n)3<3n3<3⋅3n=3n+1
for all n≥4n≥4 since (1+1n)3(1+1n)3 is decreasing on NN and this holds for the base case n=4n=4 ).
We manipulate this to use it in this case.
n≤(313)nn≤(313)n
Further, by taking natural logarithm both sides, we obtain
lnn≤ln33⋅nlnn≤ln33⋅n
for all n∈Nn∈N . Using this inequality, we obtain the upper bound for our sum. This is given by
∑k=1∞ln(1+k)2k<ln33∑k=1∞1+k2k∑k=1∞ln(1+k)2k<ln33∑k=1∞1+k2k
(we have a strict inequality since the equality of the previous result holds only if n=3n=3 )
From here, computing the exact value of the upper bound of our sum is straightforward. The first sum on the right side is an infinite geometric series.
∑k=1∞12k=121−12=1∑k=1∞12k=121−12=1
For the second sum, we consider the infinite geometric series:
∑k=0∞xk=11−x∑k=0∞xk=11−x
(which is convergent for |x|<1|x|<1 )
Here, we differentiate both sides with respect to xx and then multiply by xx on both sides. This yields
∑k=1∞k⋅xk=x(1−x)2∑k=1∞k⋅xk=x(1−x)2
With x=12x=12 , the second sum comes out to be
∑k=1∞k2k=12(1−12)2=2∑k=1∞k2k=12(1−12)2=2
Putting it all together, we have shown that
∑k=1∞ln(1+k)2k<ln33(1+2)=ln3∑k=1∞ln(1+k)2k<ln33(1+2)=ln3
Since the left side of this inequality is lnF∞lnF∞ , we take exponents both sides to conclude that
F∞<3F∞<3
which combines with the earlier statement Fn<F∞Fn<F∞ to provide the desired inequality.
Fn=234⋯(n−1)n−−√−−−−−−−−−√−−−−−−−−−−−−−−√−−−−−−−