Speaker and listener of Justice of the Peace
Answers
Answer:
Summary of English Essays (Literature)
Friday, 7 June 2019
Summary- The Justice of the Peace – Hilaire Belloc
The Justice of the Peace – Hilaire Belloc
The poem “The Justice of the Peace” is written by a French- Anglican poet Hilaire Belloc. He is a famous writer and historian. In many of his poems he satirises his society. This poem in particular talks about the economical inequalities and injustices of his society. The poem is written in the form of dramatic monologue: that is dramatic in quality and a speaker is addressing listener/listeners. Here the speaker is trying to convince someone of something by not telling the whole truth. In spite of it what the speaker does not say is revealed to the readers.
The title of the poem refers to a magistrate who hears to minor cases. Ironically in front of the magistrate the speaker justifies economical inequalities and social injustices of his society.
The speaker distinguishes between two things; which he and the addressee possess. The addressee has a shirt, a brimless hat, a shoe and half a coat. It shows that expect his outfit, the addressee does not possess anything more; Whereas the speaker, who calls himself as lord benign, has fifty hundred acres of fat land. The division of their possessions indicates the inequality they face in the society. Having such a vast land is sited as his rights by the speaker.
When the speaker tries to justify his rights for the property, he fails to do so. It forces him to leave it as simply as his rights. He orders the addressee to be calm and good; may be not to complain about the division of the things. He comments him to obey the laws, which might be in favour of the rich. He again warns the addressee to remember his lower position and not to fight against him because he may get hurt. Through this the speaker exposes his economical power which made him to be a hypocrite.
The speaker states that he does not feel jealous of the addressee’s possessions such as his coat, hat and shoe. Then why should the addressee feels jealous of the speaker’s property. Further he threatens that it is illogical to fight with economical power. If his fate is to live in poverty, why should he fight against it? Finally he reveals his cruel nature by indicating that he has got the upper hand. Through this he tries to mean that the addressee should accept his position without fighting; otherwise he has to face the worst result.
Even though the title of the poem “The Justice of the Peace” gives hope for justice, the whole poem depicts injustice faced by the poor. Hilaire Belloc as he wanted to resist the economical and social inequality, he satirises his society through this poem.
Sujaritha Saravanan at 10:15
Share
4 comments:
Unknown14 June 2020 at 07:16
Thank you for the summary and comments about this poem which reveals the reality of present day.
Reply
Unknown21 July 2020 at 22:27
Sir. The meaning of irony can u explain us once again sir
Reply
Unknown3 August 2020 at 00:08
It is became a reality poem in life
Reply
Unknown11 September 2020 at 05:01
pls essay for this in sub tittle
Reply
Add comment
‹
›
Home
View web version
About Me
My photo
Sujaritha Saravanan
Dr. S. Sujaritha is at present working as Assistant Professor of English, Pondicherry University Community College, Puducherry. Her Ph.D is on diaspora literature and Bakhtin’s theory of ‘chronotope’ and her research field of interests are Postcolonialism and Feminism. She has published twenty four papers in national and international journals and anthologies. Three more papers are accepted for publishing in national and international anthologies and journals. At present she is working on diaspora writers.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.
Answer:
The poem “the justice of the peace” is written by Hilaire Belloc.
in this poem, the poet talks about the kind of thinking that people are protesting about at the moment.
Explanation:
The verse from “the justice of the peace” is written by the author. during this verse form the writer talks concerning the sort of thinking that folks area unit protestant concerning at the moment: an entire and fervent belief that property rights area unit bimanual down from on high which it is a natural right that the state can defend your possessions, allowing you to keep your squillion greenbacks and your apartment and your yacht.
And how dare anybody question your right thereto squillion greenbacks, question your assertion that you simply earned it by operating exhausting as if the items that people do to stay a roof over their head and food within their belly and shoes on their feet (and books on their shelves and wine within the icebox and therefore the heating as high as they need and a visit to the beach in the summer if they want it) are not labor and do not have price.
We sneer at operating For Families and materialistic welfare and don't question the underlying reason behind it: that those that area unit on the common wage in New Sjaelland would have a problem supporting a family thereon and paying the same old rates of tax.
We decide beneficiaries for still having cars; for having cell phones and computers in their home; for reliably shopping for a keno price tag once a week; for having a brewage with dinner, or two, or 3 - as if our society thinks being poor ought to mean suffering all the time, not pay your cash on something you wish, not having decisions and not having the chance to form short-sighted ones from time to time as a result of, fuck it, it is a beautiful day - does not a glass of wine on the terrace sound nice?
And we do not question that, that earning the earnings if you are operating regularly in New Sjaelland means that you most likely cannot afford to rent an entire house if you are living in a very town, not while not additional government help.
We speak instead concerning how jobs could be lost as if employers rent individuals out of the goodness of their hearts and would pay additional if solely they might afford to, by gum. we tend to point out that fucking economic science graph, the one that claims that labor is value elastic and assumes that is true each way in which or that it's in any approach realistic to speak a couple of market as an entire as if demand for checkout chicks at the native New World is in any approach comparable the hiring of neurosurgeons as if the negotiating method works an equivalent approach once you are a sixteen-year previous lady because it will for a sixty-year previous grey-headed businessperson in a very suit value a month's wages.
We let the whole speech communication be overtaken by smirking fools talking seriously concerning however exhausting they worked to induce wherever they're, and WHO let the subtext run through the speech communication sort of a lead-weighted punch to the face: if you are poor it's as a result of you merit it. If you are breaking your back cleansing alternative people's floors and textile their groceries and writing their memos and organizing their offices and driving their taxis and educating their kids and - and you are not sporting thousand-dollar shoes and driving a late-model import, it's as a result of you do not merit any higher.
Except that they in fact area unit poor as a result of they created poor decisions, and they are staying poor as a result of they -- as a result of -- as a result of New Sjaelland may be a land of milk and honey and what is with all the pessimism anyway?
“The Justice of the Peace” within which the speaker chides his tenant, “I don't envy you your hat, your shoe./Why do you have to envy American state my little estate?/It’s fearfully illogical of you/To fight with economic force and fate.” we tend to laugh sadly at the irony of the verse form describing a world within which the wealthy get richer and therefore the poor get poorer.
Hence The poem “the justice of the peace” is written by Hilaire Belloc.
#SPJ3