speech of idea of India
Answers
Answer:
While we all had happily laughed at the Americans for voting Trump to power and scoffed at the average American for being racist…we may as well hide our heads in shame now…as a ‘Yogi’ – No, not ‘Yogi Bear’ who might be a more sensible bet…has been elected in our very own country as a Chief Minister and no less…!
And that too a man, who has had a string of controversies behind him, has gun-toting followers and has uttered the most bizarre theories in the past.
Blood pressures have naturally risen and people have ranted all over social media with the ‘Bhakts’ all defensive and charged up. The jokes are aplenty and there are many who wake up each morning with nothing better to do than go on and on about their love or hatred for particular political parties/politicians till it sounds like a stuck record!
We are a democratic nation and the people have spoken or rather decided that this is the way forward… Then this is how it will be for them. After all, you reap what you sow. But that doesn’t mean, we as individuals now get back to a lethargic mode and leave things in limbo… No, as good citizens of this great country and responsible ones at that… Ask yourself each day what you can do to further improve it and change things for the better.
For if things continue at this pace the unceasing growth of the RSS will unleash radicals, awaken fringe elements and result in actions that may spiral out of control. Maybe this is the moment when the opposition should push itself to rise from its slumber and cast an eye on the horizon. It just might be able to get its act together. We definitely need a strong opposition to counter balance. Prime Minister Modi will of course do his best to let the opposition continue in its blissful sleep.
I have no interest in politics per se or am an ardent supporter of any political party but yes, as an ordinary citizen… I definitely do not want a hardliner Hindutva ruling our secular nation. This is not my India. I feel parliamentary democracy in India has become a farce. For the proper working of parliamentary democracy many pre-requisites are needed and till the leaders are responsible and conscious of their duties and responsive to the public opinion, democracy itself will not be stable and we can certainly do without dictators.
The country requires someone who can get the job done with minimal expense. And saffron extremists facing trial on charges of incitement to communal rioting and attempt to murder, are certainly not required to be leaders in our country. Due to hasty decisions like this, communal cauldrons are simmering through so many parts of India and the fear of them boiling over will be nothing short of catastrophic. Endorsing Hindutva’s hard-core hardliners will only result in tearing apart the secular fabric of our country.
We grew up with pride knowing that India is ‘a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic’ and so shouldn’t all political parties based on religious ideologies be banned? Secularism implies "right to be free from religious rule" and not "freedom from religious rule". As a result, people are free to choose a religious party as their government but the resulting government cannot impose a religion.
People naturally fear that religion based parties would somehow turn the entire population into bigots and promote hatred between majority and minorities. We cannot deny that ultra-religious fringe groups wouldn't exist or be associated with religious political parties. However, again due to the very nature of democracy, their political strength would remain curbed due to their hateful and divisive actions. Most importantly, strength of democracy lies on giving voice to everyone, to even those who we don't like.
From a practical standpoint, Indian version of secularism differs from its Western counterparts. The Indian government has never considered religion as an enemy or even a competitor. That is why we see temples being run by government boards and government sponsoring of Haj pilgrimage and Amarnath yatra.
Explanation:
To understand the idea of India or that of any other nation at that, one must first understand what exactly defines a nation.
Is a nation defined by political boundaries as drawn on its maps? But, neighbouring countries often have differences as to the details of these maps and the boundaries thus defined. Is a nation then defined by the language it speaks? But, many different languages may be spoken in a nation. Is it then defined by the religion it follows, or the race of its people, or the food they eat, or the government that rules it? Again, the same issues of diversity and temporariness come up in all these possible ways of defining a nation.
The correct answer, following the beauty of Occam’s Razor, is simpler than all others: a nation is a story. A story told by its citizens to themselves believed amongst themselves, and upheld, or mutated, by themselves.
Best-selling author and anthropologist, Yuval Noah Harrari refers to this when he mentions ‘the nationalist myths of modern states’. This capability of myth-making, story-telling, to an extent where people believe fictitious entities as their collective identity, Harari argues, is actually one of the key factors to have ensured humanity’s dominance on earth. When people believe in this collective identity, it gives them a sense of belonging together and it helps them cooperate with people they have never met and do not know, people of different races, religions, and languages, the people who, nonetheless, are their fellow countrymen. This constructive nature of fiction is largely the reason why nation-states continue to exist despite the rapid globalization of the world in the last couple of decades.
In the light of this understanding about the nature of nations, let us now turn to India and its idea.
Or rather, its ideas.