speech on constitutionally guaranteed himan rights
Answers
Human rights are ‘interdependent’ and ‘interrelated’, thus the right to food is related to the right to work, the right to health, the right to social services, and most importantly, the rights of women. Certain rights such as freedom from discrimination are crosscutting and intimately related to the enjoyment of several other human rights. However, the ‘indivisibility’ of priorities and inter-relatedness of human rights do not preclude the setting of priorities in human rights programming.
John Stuart Mill wrote ‘the only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. Each is the proper guardian of his own health, whether bodily, or mental and spiritual’. This rhetoric of rights is taken up by the international declarations and treaties on human rights. Although English law does not talk in terms of rights, individuals, whether they are patients, trade unionists or protesters, inevitably revert to such language. The image of human rights is, as Tom Campbell points out, ‘morally compelling and attractively uncompromising’; practicality, the rights of others, restraints on the public purse and not least public opinion do, however, require compromise and each of the essays explores the reality or validity of a claimed right.
Like any right, human rights are defined in connection with a view of common goals to be publicly achieved through political institutions. Hence, they cannot be defined independently of an adequate institutional setting. Their existence cannot be independent of the existence of courts that are empowered to judge states and challenge their sovereignty – or at least with the idea of such courts or similar instruments. These are courts ad hoc, with the sole purpose of securing human rights, which means, a political agenda of promoting that particular common good of protecting vulnerable individuals. These courts are not the interpreters of a universal and a-temporal truth, in the same way as human rights are not neutral principles. Institutions of this kind are not acting in a neutral ‘no-where’ zone, but they establish a community formed in connection with the common perception of human rights as a common goal – a common goal that ought to prevail when in conflict with other more specific goals of independent states and historical human groups. Thank you and have a nice day
Answer:
Constitutionally guaranteed human rights.
Explanation:
Good morning to one and all and everyone present over here.
I am giving speech on Constitutionally guaranteed human rights.
Humans are sensible creatures. They have some fundamental, unalienable rights—known as human rights—by virtue of being humans. They come into being at the time of birth since they are born humans and as such have access to these rights. The 1950-adopted Indian Constitution grants its inhabitants certain rights known as the Fundamental Rights (Part-3, article 14-35). Similar to the rights outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Social, Economic, and Cultural Rights, these rights are also protected internationally. Justice is the source of these rights.
Human rights are "interdependent" and "related," so the right to food is connected to other rights, including the right to social services, the right to health care, the right to employment, and, most significantly, the right to women's rights. A number of additional human rights, including the right to be free from discrimination, are intertwined with and dependent upon several other rights. The interconnectedness of human rights and the "indivisibility" of priorities, however, do not prevent the establishment of priorities in human rights programming.
The right to life, liberty, equality, and respect for all people are all examples of what is meant by the term "human rights." The Indian Constitution contains a section titled "Rights and Basic Rights" that outlines the nation's citizens' fundamental rights.
There are specifically six basic or human rights recognised in India: the rights to freedom, equality, protection from exploitation, freedom of religion, culture, and education, and access to constitutional remedies.
Internationally, the government of a nation may bring criminal charges against an individual for violating international human rights conventions, humanitarian laws, or crimes against humanity, or another nation may do so as well under the "universal jurisdiction" principle.
Thank you.
#SPJ2