Question

»»✭ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʏᴏᴜ ᴀɢʀᴇᴇ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴇssᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ ᴜɴɪᴠᴇʀsᴀʟ ʀɪɢʜᴛsʙ ᴡᴀs ʙᴇsᴇᴛ ᴡɪᴛʜ. ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴀᴅɪᴄᴛɪᴏɴ? ᴇxᴘʟᴀɪɴ »»✭​

Answer 1

$\underline\bold\red{AnswEr}$

Yes, the message of universal rights was beset with contradictions: Many ideas in the "Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen" were replete with dubious meanings. For example, "the law has the right to forbid only actions injurious to society" had nothing to say about criminal offences against other individuals.

Answer 2

Question :-

»»✭ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʏᴏᴜ ᴀɢʀᴇᴇ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴇssᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ ᴜɴɪᴠᴇʀsᴀʟ ʀɪɢʜᴛsʙ ᴡᴀs ʙᴇsᴇᴛ ᴡɪᴛʜ. ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴀᴅɪᴄᴛɪᴏɴ? ᴇxᴘʟᴀɪɴ »»✭

AnsWer :-

Yes, the message of universal rights was beset with contradictions: ... For example, "the law has the right to forbid only actions injurious to society" had nothing to say about criminal offences against other individuals. The declaration stated that "law is the expression of the general will.

Hope it helps !!!