Question

state four economic benefits of a fall in mortality rate? ​

Answer 1

1 stability of population is maintained

2 a healthy workforce is ensured

3 Greater productivity of output

4 Increase in GDP

Answer 2

e influence of economic conditions on mortality has been recognized at least since biblical times. Empiricism of the most casual sort was sufficient to establish the link between food supply and mortality. Other components of living standards, such as shelter and living space, awaited a revolution in scientific method before their influence was finally acknowledged. But recent years have witnessed a movement away from economic determinism in mortality analysis. It is widely believed that mortality has become increasingly dissociated from economic level because of a diffusion of medical and health technologies, facilities and personnel that occurred, in large part, independently of economic level, yet this position has its critics who have gained a sympathetic audience.1–4 This article utilizes readily available evidence in a new but obvious way to estimate the relative contribution of economic factors to increases in life expectancy during the 20th century. The evidence consists of cross-sectional relationships between national life expectancies and national income per head evaluated during three different decades of the 20th century. These relationships are further used to assess the realism of certain economic-demographic models and to re-examine what have become classical distinctions regarding sources of mortality declines in Western and non-Western areas.

There are several reasons for focusing on national income rather than on another socio-economic variable. First, national income is probably the best single indicator of living standards in a country, since it comprises the value of all final products (goods and services) produced in a certain period. A wide range of these products can be expected to influence mortality, and expenditures on all of them are represented, with varying weights, in national income. It is the indicator most comprehensive of these multiple factors. Secondly, as the leading index of level of economic development, income per head is the focus of growth models from which policy measures are derived.

Hope it helps uh