Question

State the adverse effects of adopting a ‘majoritarian’ model of power sharing, with reference to Sri Lanka

Answer 1

Answer:

i) Tamils felt the government was not sensitive about Tamil language and culture

i) Tamils felt the government was not sensitive about Tamil language and culture.(ii) Tamils felt discriminated against in jobs and education.

i) Tamils felt the government was not sensitive about Tamil language and culture.(ii) Tamils felt discriminated against in jobs and education. (iii) Tamils felt the government was practicing religious discrimination.

i) Tamils felt the government was not sensitive about Tamil language and culture.(ii) Tamils felt discriminated against in jobs and education. (iii) Tamils felt the government was practicing religious discrimination. (iv) Relations between Tamils and Sinhalese became strained.

Hope it's helpful

please mark me as brainliest

Answer 2

Explanation:

(i) Tamils felt the government was not sensitive about Tamil language and culture.

(ii) Tamils felt discriminated against in jobs and education.

(iii) Tamils felt the government was practicing religious discrimination.

(iv) Relations between Tamils and Sinhalese became strained.

Majoritarianism in Sri Lanka:

The leaders of the Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over government by virtue of their majority. As a result, the democratically elected government adopted a series of Majoritarian measures to establish Sinhala supremacy.