Political Science, asked by debbarmarubel123, 4 months ago

State the political impact of globalization on the world.​

Answers

Answered by kajalamrita09
4

Answer:

Globalization phenomenon, as an inescapable process, has influenced many

scopes of human life. This phenomenon with its superpower of influence has created

new and different age than the past. Among individual and social various scopes of

human life, the culture and politics have been more influenced by globalization. The

cultural scope, as a most basic, general, widespread and vital of individual and social

property of mankind, has been more influenced by globalization that the politics.

Evolution in culture and notion of human about himself, increase of knowledge,

nation’s political-cultural awakening, formation of new political-cultural identity,

increases of human mobility, and etc. are as positive influence of globalization on

culture. Of course, this phenomenon has had some mortal and uncultured

consequences such as; identity crisis, weaken subcultures and expand culture of

Western consumptionalization in Eastern societies and less development countries. In

politics scope, globalization has had many negative and positive consequences such

as; increase power and liberty of nations, groups and nongovernmental parties,

expand of new political culture, weaken and washy of the role and hegemony of states

in illegitimate controlling of nations, change and redefinition of political theories in

national and international scopes, inter new political actors into in scopes of regional,

national and global decision making.

In this chapter, due to achieve the goals of research, will more discussed on

role and impact of globalization on various matters of culture and politics.

Explanation:

mark me as brainliest

Answered by sveda
2

Anti-globalism activists often depict the McDonald’s, Disney, and Coca-Cola corporations as agents of globalism or cultural imperialism—a new form of economic and political domination. Critics of globalism argue that any business enterprise capable of manipulating personal tastes will thrive, whereas state authorities everywhere will lose control over the distribution of goods and services. According to this view of world power, military force is perceived as hopelessly out of step or even powerless; the control of culture (and its production) is seen as far more important than the control of political and geographic borders. Certainly, it is true that national boundaries are increasingly permeable and any effort by nations to exclude global pop culture usually makes the banned objects all the more irresistible.

The commodities involved in the exchange of popular culture are related to lifestyle, especially as experienced by young people: pop music, film, video, comics, fashion, fast foods, beverages, home decorations, entertainment systems, and exercise equipment. Millions of people obtain the unobtainable by using the Internet to breach computer security systems and import barriers. “Information wants to be free” was the clarion call of software designers and aficionados of the World Wide Web in the 1990s. This code of ethics takes its most creative form in societies where governments try hardest to control the flow of information (e.g., China and Iran). In 1999, when Serbian officials shut down the operations of Radio B92, the independent station continued its coverage of events in the former Republic of Yugoslavia by moving its broadcasts to the Internet.

The idea of a borderless world is reflected in theories of the “virtual state,” a new system of world politics that is said to reflect the essential chaos of 21st-century capitalism. In Out of Control (1994), author Kevin Kelly predicted that the Internet would gradually erode the power of governments to control citizens; advances in digital technology would instead allow people to follow their own interests and form trans-state coalitions. Similarly, Richard Rosecrance, in The Rise of the Virtual State (1999), wrote that military conflicts and territorial disputes would be superseded by the flow of information, capital, technology, and manpower between states. Many scholars disagreed, insisting that the state was unlikely to disappear and could continue to be an essential and effective basis of governance.

Similar questions